Evidence of reference standard related bias in studies of plain radiograph reading performance: a meta-regression.

scientific article published on 6 December 2006

Evidence of reference standard related bias in studies of plain radiograph reading performance: a meta-regression. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
meta-analysisQ815382
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P356DOI10.1259/BJR/41006673
P698PubMed publication ID17151064
P5875ResearchGate publication ID6648483

P50authorAndy J ScallyQ39876394
P2093author name stringHahn S
Godfrey C
Brealey SD
P2860cites workEmpirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic testsQ30776370
The radiological appearances of tuberous sclerosisQ33865425
Measuring the effects of image interpretation: an evaluative frameworkQ34268633
Bias in plain film reading performance studiesQ34270291
Review article: methodological standards in radiographer plain film reading performance studiesQ34563428
Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis.Q36017353
Accuracy of radiographers red dot or triage of accident and emergency radiographs in clinical practice: a systematic review.Q36511532
How well can radiographers triage x ray films in accident and emergency departments?Q40092144
Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigationQ41493503
Short communication: plain film reporting by radiographers--a feasibility studyQ42057786
The costs and effects of introducing selectively trained radiographers to an A&E reporting service: a retrospective controlled before and after study.Q50761631
Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs.Q52865169
Reporting of fracture radiographs by radiographers: the impact of a training programme.Q52882080
Can radiographers read screening mammograms?Q54365779
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiativeQ56880328
P433issue954
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectbiasQ742736
meta-regressionQ6822263
P304page(s)406-413
P577publication date2006-12-06
P1433published inBritish Journal of RadiologyQ15758529
P1476titleEvidence of reference standard related bias in studies of plain radiograph reading performance: a meta-regression
P478volume80

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q57137008ACCURACY OF THE LEVER SIGN TO DIAGNOSE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TEAR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
Q37372242Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity of radiographers' plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice.
Q46348541Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results
Q37089869Establishing a gold standard for test sets: variation in interpretive agreement of expert mammographers
Q38877380Molecular assessment of disease states in kidney transplant biopsy samples
Q34083600Recommendations for the evaluation of pathology data in nonclinical safety biomarker qualification studies.
Q50743724Using Molecular Phenotyping to Guide Improvements in the Histologic Diagnosis of T Cell-Mediated Rejection.

Search more.