scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0170 |
P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_a5azepfwbfhhhjaeapu6jr4pie |
P932 | PMC publication ID | 4811229 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 27136470 |
P2093 | author name string | Vitor Cavadas | |
Frederico Branco | |||
João Ferreira Cabral | |||
Avelino Fraga Ferreira | |||
Isaac Campos Braga | |||
Miguel Silva Ramos | |||
P2860 | cites work | Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease | Q24239947 |
The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients | Q28286383 | ||
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. | Q30228474 | ||
Transvaginal access: current experience and potential implications for urologic applications | Q37479789 | ||
Public perception of "scarless" surgery: a critical analysis of the literature | Q38015571 | ||
Laparoscopic morcellator-related complications | Q38170907 | ||
Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future? | Q39764855 | ||
Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery | Q40021301 | ||
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): patients' perceptions and attitudes | Q42606794 | ||
ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. | Q44319389 | ||
Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients. | Q44627928 | ||
Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal NOTES: a prospective cohort study of 106 patients | Q48396652 | ||
Sexual response in the patient after hysterectomy: total abdominal versus supracervical versus vaginal procedure | Q49208259 | ||
Female sexual function after pure transvaginal appendectomy: a cohort study. | Q51402447 | ||
Determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis. | Q51403595 | ||
How do gynecologists feel about transvaginal NOTES surgery? | Q53139080 | ||
Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. | Q53881781 | ||
An innovative technique for colorectal specimen retrieval: a new era of "natural orifice specimen extraction" (N.O.S.E). | Q54422392 | ||
Laparoscopic nephrectomy with vaginal delivery of the intact kidney | Q72911767 | ||
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for malignancy: vaginal route for retrieval of intact specimen | Q74594022 | ||
Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy | Q74628318 | ||
Perspectives of laparoscopic donors toward a new procedure: transvaginal donor nephrectomy | Q82749768 | ||
Transvaginal specimen extraction after laparoscopic colectomy | Q83532621 | ||
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P304 | page(s) | 78-82 | |
P577 | publication date | 2016-01-01 | |
P1433 | published in | International Brazilian Journal of Urology | Q26841933 |
P1476 | title | What about vaginal extraction of the kidney? results of an online survey | |
P478 | volume | 42 |
Q97887423 | Robotic transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for bilateral salpingo oophorectomy | cites work | P2860 |