Moral Controversy, Directive Counsel, and the Doctorʼs Role: Findings From a National Survey of Obstetrician–Gynecologists

scientific article published on September 1, 2010

Moral Controversy, Directive Counsel, and the Doctorʼs Role: Findings From a National Survey of Obstetrician–Gynecologists is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1097/ACM.0B013E3181EABACC
P953full work available at URLhttp://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?issn=1040-2446&volume=85&issue=9&spage=1475
http://journals.lww.com/00001888-201009000-00019
https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181eabacc
https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3634119
https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3634119?pdf=render
https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2010/09000/Moral_Controversy,_Directive_Counsel,_and_the.19.aspx
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20736675/?tool=EBI
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20736675/pdf/?tool=EBI
P932PMC publication ID3634119
P698PubMed publication ID20736675

P50authorFarr A CurlinQ87847500
P2093author name stringKenneth A. Rasinski
John D. Yoon
P2860cites workCommentary: A case for studying the relationship between religion and the practice of medicineQ43927519
Professionalism in modern medicine: does the emperor have any clothes?Q47820563
Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles.Q51036769
Ethically problematic treatment decisions in different medical specialties.Q51892373
Viewpoint: today's professionalism: engaging the mind but not the heart.Q52038435
Regarding the end of medicine and the pursuit of health.Q52114050
Who makes the decision? Patient's autonomy vs paternalism in a Confucian societyQ53371353
Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians.Q53501810
Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: a survey of practitioners.Q53589622
Professional responsibility and individual conscience: protecting the informed consent process from impermissible biasQ56784948
Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationshipQ71658568
Characteristics of female obstetrician-gynecologists in the United StatesQ73145228
Of more than one mind: obstetrician-gynecologists' approaches to morally controversial decisions in sexual and reproductive healthcareQ81451188
How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood.Q30327951
Medical ethics education: where are we? Where should we be going? A review.Q30351927
Viewpoint: the importance of worldviews for medical education.Q30363941
Building character: a model for reflective practice.Q30380139
An international survey of medical ethics curricula in AsiaQ30832841
Clinical decision-making: physicians' preferences and experiencesQ33278827
Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician surveyQ33840863
Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practicesQ33840889
Attitudes of genetic counselors: a multinational surveyQ35245953
Four models of the physician-patient relationshipQ35965482
Does obstetric ethics have any role in the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy?Q37991745
Birth outcomes for Arabic-named women in California before and after September 11.Q38468998
Informed and shared decision-making: the crux of patient-centered careQ39433296
Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choiceQ41224115
Searching for moral certainty in medicine: a proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter.Q42063362
Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients' and physicians' views.Q42134848
P433issue9
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectattitude of health personnelQ60589811
P304page(s)1475-1481
P577publication date2010-09-01
P1433published inAcademic MedicineQ15751327
P1476titleMoral controversy, directive counsel, and the doctor's role: findings from a national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists
Moral Controversy, Directive Counsel, and the Doctorʼs Role: Findings From a National Survey of Obstetrician–Gynecologists
P478volume85

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37549818Capsule commentary on Putman et al., directive counsel and morally controversial medical decision-making: findings from two national surveys of primary care physicians
Q36784045Conflict and emotional exhaustion in obstetrician-gynaecologists: a national survey
Q58378627Conflicts in Care for Obstetric Complications in Catholic Hospitals
Q33603872Conscientious refusals to refer: findings from a national physician survey
Q37549808Directive counsel and morally controversial medical decision-making: findings from two national surveys of primary care physicians
Q39437404Does professional orientation predict ethical sensitivities? Attitudes of paediatric and obstetric specialists toward fetuses, pregnant women and pregnancy termination
Q35111784General internists' preferences and knowledge about the care of adult survivors of childhood cancer: a cross-sectional survey
Q35780818Medical student opinions on character development in medical education: a national survey
Q35151004Obstetrician-gynecologists' beliefs about safe-sex and abstinence counseling
Q37658479Perinatal management of trisomy 18: a survey of obstetricians in Australia, New Zealand and the UK
Q37141479Pregnancy continuation and organizational religious activity following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect are associated with improved psychological outcome
Q37065747Providing guidance to patients: physicians' views about the relative responsibilities of doctors and religious communities