Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery

scientific article published on 31 July 2008

Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1024028061
P356DOI10.1186/1477-7525-6-55
P932PMC publication ID2527304
P698PubMed publication ID18667085
P5875ResearchGate publication ID23137502

P50authorRachelle BuchbinderQ28036349
Richard OsborneQ37392368
Ewa M RoosQ37834549
Lucy BusijaQ39407859
P2093author name stringAnna Nilsdotter
P2860cites workResponsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement.Q53221884
Measuring outcomes in cervical spine surgery: think twice before using the SF-36.Q53222262
Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed.Q53270290
Health-related quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: comparison of generic and disease-specific instruments.Q53310928
Substantial disability 3 months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: A prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes.Q53513546
Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee.Q53540254
Adaptation and Validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for Use in AustraliaQ56747320
Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical exampleQ57830004
A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groupsQ60629828
Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomyQ60717367
MEASURING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AFTER DISCHARGE FROM INPATIENT REHABILITATION SETTINGS1Q61454104
Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacementQ62399342
The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuriesQ71448956
What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement?Q71733758
Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients' quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population normsQ73015545
The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplastyQ73437206
Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsivenessQ77582697
The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severityQ77769341
Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcomeQ81158528
Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacementQ81195753
Similar group mean scores, but large individual variations, in patient-relevant outcomes over 2 years in meniscectomized subjects with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritisQ24799683
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacementQ24802364
Comparison of AIMS2-SF, WOMAC, x-ray and a global physician assessment in order to approach quality of life in patients suffering from osteoarthritisQ25257019
The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliabilityQ30577462
Monitoring health outcomes among patients with arthritis using the SF-36 Health Survey: overviewQ33640014
Arthroscopic or conservative treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears: a prospective randomised trialQ34600480
Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problemsQ35165720
Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation interventionQ35550805
Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.Q35552077
Standard deviations and standard errorsQ36285640
The Dutch version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: a validation studyQ36532569
Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important changeQ36574066
Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life QuestionnaireQ39602227
The challenge of recruiting patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee into a randomized clinical trial comparing surgical and non-surgical treatmentQ40264828
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?Q40407177
Recommended methodology for assessing the progression of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee jointsQ40429394
Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the loQ40691947
Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP).Q40771245
Measurement error. Measurement error is that which we have not yet explainedQ42781295
Measurement errorQ43189733
The SF-36 in an Australian sample: validating a new, generic health status measureQ43977627
Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36.Q48016623
Is the Health Utilities Index valid in total hip arthroplasty patients?Q50480332
Health-related quality of life, health risk behaviors, and disability among adults with pain-related activity difficulty.Q51925432
Comparing SF-36 scores across three groups of women with different health profiles.Q51927625
A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery.Q51967227
Measuring health status in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form 36-item health survey (SF-36).Q51993683
P304page(s)55
P577publication date2008-07-31
P1433published inHealth and Quality of Life OutcomesQ15757755
P1476titleMagnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery
P478volume6