scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1024028061 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-6-55 |
P932 | PMC publication ID | 2527304 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 18667085 |
P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 23137502 |
P50 | author | Rachelle Buchbinder | Q28036349 |
Richard Osborne | Q37392368 | ||
Ewa M Roos | Q37834549 | ||
Lucy Busija | Q39407859 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Anna Nilsdotter | |
P2860 | cites work | Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. | Q53221884 |
Measuring outcomes in cervical spine surgery: think twice before using the SF-36. | Q53222262 | ||
Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed. | Q53270290 | ||
Health-related quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: comparison of generic and disease-specific instruments. | Q53310928 | ||
Substantial disability 3 months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: A prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes. | Q53513546 | ||
Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. | Q53540254 | ||
Adaptation and Validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for Use in Australia | Q56747320 | ||
Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example | Q57830004 | ||
A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups | Q60629828 | ||
Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomy | Q60717367 | ||
MEASURING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AFTER DISCHARGE FROM INPATIENT REHABILITATION SETTINGS1 | Q61454104 | ||
Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement | Q62399342 | ||
The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries | Q71448956 | ||
What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? | Q71733758 | ||
Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients' quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms | Q73015545 | ||
The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty | Q73437206 | ||
Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness | Q77582697 | ||
The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity | Q77769341 | ||
Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome | Q81158528 | ||
Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement | Q81195753 | ||
Similar group mean scores, but large individual variations, in patient-relevant outcomes over 2 years in meniscectomized subjects with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritis | Q24799683 | ||
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement | Q24802364 | ||
Comparison of AIMS2-SF, WOMAC, x-ray and a global physician assessment in order to approach quality of life in patients suffering from osteoarthritis | Q25257019 | ||
The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability | Q30577462 | ||
Monitoring health outcomes among patients with arthritis using the SF-36 Health Survey: overview | Q33640014 | ||
Arthroscopic or conservative treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears: a prospective randomised trial | Q34600480 | ||
Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems | Q35165720 | ||
Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention | Q35550805 | ||
Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. | Q35552077 | ||
Standard deviations and standard errors | Q36285640 | ||
The Dutch version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: a validation study | Q36532569 | ||
Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change | Q36574066 | ||
Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire | Q39602227 | ||
The challenge of recruiting patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee into a randomized clinical trial comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment | Q40264828 | ||
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? | Q40407177 | ||
Recommended methodology for assessing the progression of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joints | Q40429394 | ||
Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lo | Q40691947 | ||
Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). | Q40771245 | ||
Measurement error. Measurement error is that which we have not yet explained | Q42781295 | ||
Measurement error | Q43189733 | ||
The SF-36 in an Australian sample: validating a new, generic health status measure | Q43977627 | ||
Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36. | Q48016623 | ||
Is the Health Utilities Index valid in total hip arthroplasty patients? | Q50480332 | ||
Health-related quality of life, health risk behaviors, and disability among adults with pain-related activity difficulty. | Q51925432 | ||
Comparing SF-36 scores across three groups of women with different health profiles. | Q51927625 | ||
A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. | Q51967227 | ||
Measuring health status in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form 36-item health survey (SF-36). | Q51993683 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 55 | |
P577 | publication date | 2008-07-31 | |
P1433 | published in | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Q15757755 |
P1476 | title | Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery | |
P478 | volume | 6 |