Are you reading what we are reading? The effect of who interprets medical images on estimates of diagnostic test accuracy in systematic reviews

scientific article published on August 2007

Are you reading what we are reading? The effect of who interprets medical images on estimates of diagnostic test accuracy in systematic reviews is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1259/BJR/83042364
P698PubMed publication ID17762057
P5875ResearchGate publication ID6078390

P2093author name stringBrealey S
Westwood M
P2860cites workThe hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysisQ29619369
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic testsQ30776370
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.Q33235606
Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferableQ33809569
Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians and implications for screening programmes: observational studyQ33915009
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaborationQ34167832
Measuring the effects of image interpretation: an evaluative frameworkQ34268633
Bias in plain film reading performance studiesQ34270291
How to read a paper. Papers that report diagnostic or screening testsQ34442137
Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice.Q34513646
Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic reviewQ35646382
Accuracy of radiographers red dot or triage of accident and emergency radiographs in clinical practice: a systematic review.Q36511532
Observer variability in assessing lumbar spinal stenosis severity on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to cross-sectional spinal canal areaQ39602306
Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.Q40461184
The architecture of diagnostic researchQ41829431
Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus storage phosphor radiography.Q52886121
P433issue956
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
medical imagingQ931309
P304page(s)674-677
P577publication date2007-08-01
P1433published inBritish Journal of RadiologyQ15758529
P1476titleAre you reading what we are reading? The effect of who interprets medical images on estimates of diagnostic test accuracy in systematic reviews
P478volume80

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q51857312Automatic determination of Greulich and Pyle bone age in healthy Dutch children.
Q36840358Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review.
Q35192026Evaluating radiographers' diagnostic accuracy in screen-reading mammograms: what constitutes a quality study?
Q34148080Inter-rater agreement in the assessment of abnormal chest X-ray findings for tuberculosis between two Asian countries
Q34340104Reader variability in the use of diagnostic terms to describe white matter lesions seen on cranial scans of severely premature infants: the ELGAN study
Q40047434The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up.

Search more.