Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

scientific article published on January 2010

Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care. is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1093/JNCIMONOGRAPHS/LGQ009
P932PMC publication ID3731434
P698PubMed publication ID20386054
P5875ResearchGate publication ID43131229

P50authorRobin YabroffQ71719506
P2093author name stringStephen H Taplin
Rebecca Anhang Price
Caroline Cranos
Jane Zapka
P2860cites workThe meaning of translational research and why it mattersQ28264016
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of RadiologyQ28274937
Cancer statistics, 2007Q29547293
What is the most effective way to communicate results after endoscopy?Q30483507
Association between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammogramsQ33330999
Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screeningQ33377274
Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literatureQ33644598
Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential?Q34058738
Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogramQ34141799
Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidenceQ34173853
Improving adherence to abnormal Pap smear follow-upQ34201224
Adherence to care plan in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a review of barriers and interventions.Q34226631
Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery.Q34232368
Does the chronic care model serve also as a template for improving prevention?Q34491882
Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammogramsQ34615110
Harvard report on cancer prevention, volume 5: fulfilling the potential for cancer prevention: policy approachesQ34645844
Physician and patient factors associated with ordering a colon evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood testQ34741635
Present standards for cervical cancer screeningQ34793733
Physician-reported reasons for limited follow-up of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test screening result.Q47617609
How gastroenterologists inform patients of results after lower endoscopy.Q51352019
Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario, Canada--a replication study.Q51675062
Providing an endoscopy report to patients after a procedure: a low-cost intervention with high returns.Q51895767
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patientsQ56688987
HPV testing versus repeat Pap testing for the management of a minor abnormal Pap smear: evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choiceQ56783286
Cervical Cancer in Women With Comprehensive Health Care Access: Attributable Factors in the Screening ProcessQ60622481
Re: Breast Cancer Screening Comes Full CircleQ60622482
A national survey of primary care physicians' methods for screening for fecal occult bloodQ64132638
The changing interface of primary and specialty careQ71092852
Diagnostic testing following fecal occult blood screening in the elderlyQ73053935
The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care ModelQ79365322
Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States)Q82254795
Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalitiesQ35215923
Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results.Q35217580
Interim guidance for the use of human papillomavirus DNA testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screeningQ35644704
Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screeningQ35664998
The future of research that promotes cancer screeningQ35865878
Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizationsQ35871452
Towards better communication in cancer care: a framework for developing evidence-based interventionsQ35914537
Review article: Population screening for colorectal cancerQ36321324
The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosisQ36352753
Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty careQ36352783
Designing studies that would address the multilayered nature of health careQ36352805
Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodologyQ36411016
Physician-patient communication about colorectal cancer screeningQ36416846
Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap testsQ36793872
Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority womenQ36946381
2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening testsQ36955449
Reasons patients with a positive fecal occult blood test result do not undergo complete diagnostic evaluationQ37060085
Organizational factors and the cancer screening processQ37064290
Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issuesQ37149717
Comprehensive diagnostic program for medically underserved women with abnormal breast screening evaluations in an urban populationQ37151365
Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?Q37185870
Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic reviewQ37186919
Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic reviewQ37186923
Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentivesQ37186929
Barriers to diagnostic resolution after abnormal mammography: a review of the literatureQ37261264
Family planning provider referral, facilitation behavior, and patient follow-up for abnormal Pap smearsQ37309782
Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosisQ37378606
Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for changeQ38577543
Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trialQ39768162
Neighborhood-level socioeconomic predictors of nonadherence to mammography screening guidelinesQ39821822
Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002.Q39822160
From 'silent' to 'heard': professional mediation, manipulation and women's experiences of their body after an abnormal Pap smearQ40018493
Association between health insurance coverage of office visit and cancer screening among womenQ40624002
Effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screeningQ40745960
A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future researchQ40869810
Improving the follow-up of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smear results.Q41643913
Innovative provider- and health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening deliveryQ44220210
The effect of HEDIS measurement of colorectal cancer screening on insurance plans in PennsylvaniaQ44280160
Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood testQ46329100
P433issue40
P304page(s)58-71
P577publication date2010-01-01
P1433published inJournal of the National Cancer Institute MonographsQ15756343
P1476titleFactors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care
P478volume2010