Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it?

scientific article published on March 2008

Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358
meta-analysisQ815382

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2007.09.038
P698PubMed publication ID18291224
P5875ResearchGate publication ID5561427

P50authorThanos AthanasiouQ89313115
Bari MurtuzaQ114413126
Rex DeL StanbridgeQ114413130
Ara DarziQ336080
P2093author name stringCatherine Jones
John R Pepper
Christopher Rao
P433issue3
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectaortaQ101004
P304page(s)1121-1131
P577publication date2008-03-01
P1433published inThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryQ1939819
P1476titleMinimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it?
P478volume85

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q36459150A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients
Q52620294A technique of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: an alternative to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Q26852270Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for mitral valve disease: a meta-analysis
Q36227848Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for the treatment of congenital heart defects: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Q36844233Aortic Valve Surgery: Minimally Invasive Options
Q50452306Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
Q39749199Aortic valve replacement via right anterolateral thoracotomy in the case of a patient with extreme mediastinal right-shift following pneumonectomy
Q50144251Assisted venous drainage on cardiopulmonary bypass for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: is it necessary, useful or desirable?
Q40657128Clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in 658 patients receiving the Perceval sutureless aortic valve: early results from a prospective European multicentre study (the Cavalier Trial)†.
Q41835677Complications and conversions in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery
Q38224882Current status of surgical treatment for aortic valve stenosis
Q92587912Does minimal invasive cardiac surgery reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation?
Q37373345Does minimal-access aortic valve replacement reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation?
Q33571158Early results of the Sorin® Perceval S sutureless valve: systematic review and meta-analysis
Q41271213European multicentre experience with the sutureless Perceval valve: clinical and haemodynamic outcomes up to 5 years in over 700 patients
Q51474510Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Q51202342How can cardiothoracic and vascular medical devices stay in the market?
Q36842254Influence of body mass index on outcomes after minimal-access aortic valve replacement through a J-shaped partial upper sternotomy.
Q43537025J-shaped versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circuit
Q29994645Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement
Q38221465Manubrium-limited sternotomy decreases blood loss after aortic valve replacement surgery
Q51296651Mini-aortic surgery with percutaneous cannulation and rapid-deployment valve.
Q35577340Mini-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement reduces the length of stay in the cardiac intensive care unit: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Q37319193Minimal access aortic valve replacement via limited skin incision and complete median sternotomy
Q36840124Minimal access median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in elderly patients
Q47758301Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies
Q53605301Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.
Q43875011Minimal invasive implantation of an EDWARDS INTUITY rapid deployment aortic valve
Q38163991Minimal-access median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Q31050235Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study From the UK National Data
Q38580069Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement - pros and cons of keyhole aortic surgery
Q35256939Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience.
Q40922260Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.
Q35029250Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: the Leipzig experience
Q56963782Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery
Q35029275Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions
Q35029289Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the "Miami Method".
Q37284166Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Q27026385Minimally invasive rapid deployment Edwards Intuity aortic valve implantation
Q41834034Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement.
Q27024205Minimally invasive root surgery: a Bentall procedure through a J-ministernotomy
Q28087732Ministernotomy or minithoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
Q41318170Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement
Q56587892Retracted: right anterior minithoracotomy for minimal access aortic valve replacement
Q88195718Review of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery
Q47113527Review of minimal access versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis
Q54964558Right anterior mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison.
Q38361137Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement
Q44219203Surgery of the ascending aorta, root remodelling and aortic arch surgery with circulatory arrest through partial upper sternotomy: results of 50 consecutive cases
Q49913740Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.
Q30316000Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel.
Q88305977Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Q89376711Ten-year experience with the Perceval S sutureless prosthesis: lessons learned and future perspectives
Q47803764The evolution of minimally invasive cardiac surgery: from minimal access to transcatheter approaches
Q37854705The evolution of transapical aortic valve implantation and new perspectives
Q47765846Trainees can learn minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without compromising safety
Q37538741Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and potential role of 3D imaging
Q45888486Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation
Q88093372Video assisted right mini-thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement
Q39039069What is the role of sutureless aortic valves in today's armamentarium?