The relative importance of undesirable truths

scientific article

The relative importance of undesirable truths is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S11019-012-9449-X
P932PMC publication ID3832758
P698PubMed publication ID23160857
P5875ResearchGate publication ID233538103

P50authorLisa BortolottiQ21402743
P2860cites workThe right not to know: an autonomy based approachQ30478569
The new genetics. Psychological responses to genetic testingQ33789196
Genetic information, rights, and autonomyQ34504617
Ignorance, information and autonomyQ34504622
Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implicationsQ34713781
Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic reviewQ35044477
The right not to know: the case of psychiatric disordersQ38770294
Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child: the moral agent and the open future.Q40247149
The right to remain in ignorance about genetic information--can such a right be defended in the name of autonomy?Q40392889
Freedom and a right (not) to know.Q51962731
Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview.Q52880578
Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge.Q53579754
Deception in Psychology: Moral Costs and Benefits of Unsought Self-KnowledgeQ60397483
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 2.0 GenericQ19125117
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue4
P304page(s)683-690
P577publication date2013-11-01
P1433published inMedicine Health Care and PhilosophyQ15752357
P1476titleThe relative importance of undesirable truths
P478volume16

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q56764682Free Choice and Patient Best Interests
Q47425976Homo Ignorans: Deliberately Choosing Not to Know
Q28074184Privacy and confidentiality measures in genetic testing and counselling: arguing on genetic exceptionalism again?
Q48084782Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional, and Legal Implications