Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views

scientific article published on March 2002

Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1046/J.1369-6513.2002.00157.X
P932PMC publication ID5060124
P698PubMed publication ID11906541

P2093author name stringChristine Campbell
Nicholas Scott
Sara MacDonald
Ann Lees
Sheila N Scott
P2860cites workHealth needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the publicQ33790357
Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: survey of public and cliniciansQ33814778
Funding the NHS. Is the NHS underfunded?Q36242039
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.Q36243391
The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case againstQ36243932
The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case for.Q36243971
Health care rationing: the public's debateQ36597614
Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationingQ36904062
Developing a prioritisation framework: experiences from a Scottish Health AuthorityQ37331254
Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group studyQ37431420
Health care priorities as a problem of local resource allocationQ42598545
Reluctant rationers: public input to health care prioritiesQ48762497
Comparison of doctors', nurses', politicians' and public attitudes to health care priorities.Q52296542
Public disagrees with professionals over NHS rationingQ57241637
Involving consumers in health care decision makingQ74832471
P433issue1
P304page(s)47-54
P577publication date2002-03-01
P1433published inHealth ExpectationsQ15753949
P1476titleDeciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views
P478volume5