In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review

scientific article published on 30 January 2014

In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1035824470
P356DOI10.1186/1471-2393-14-52
P8608Fatcat IDrelease_ouhsfgabtzb3dltuatxt56j2e4
P932PMC publication ID3912922
P698PubMed publication ID24475912
P5875ResearchGate publication ID259983956

P50authorShelley A WilkinsonQ57338344
Claire JacksonQ42541145
Glenda HawleyQ59681684
P2093author name stringTina Janamian
P2860cites workShared antenatal care in BrisbaneQ42619761
Carrying their own medical records: the perspective of pregnant womenQ42667459
Notes on a stick: use and acceptability of woman-held maternity notesQ42670278
Blueprint for action: steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system.Q44255241
Risk management considerations and the pregnancy handheld record. An audit of the return rate of the pregnancy handheld record.Q50924717
Shared maternity care: all care--not enough responsibility? An audit of patient care communications pre- and post- a multi-faceted intervention.Q50949218
Construction of a GP integration model.Q54378808
The Newbury Maternity Care Study: a randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records.Q54379666
Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity information technology?Q55625977
Improving health behaviours during pregnancy: A new direction for the pregnancy handheld recordQ57338654
Articulating Gender in the Context of ICTs in Health Care: The Case of Electronic Patient Records in the Maternity ServicesQ57769223
Views of Heads of Midwifery on electronic patient recordsQ57769231
Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancyQ24247129
Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utilityQ24598961
Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?Q24635306
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ27860606
Perinatal data collection: current practice in the Australian nursing and midwifery healthcare context.Q30620965
Computerization of data: a person-based medical record systemQ33498732
Delivery of maternal health care in Indigenous primary care services: baseline data for an ongoing quality improvement initiativeQ33840187
Sharing obstetric care: barriers to integrated systems of care.Q34048961
Should women carry their antenatal records?Q34284140
A review of antenatal care initiatives in primary care settingsQ34368585
How well are parent held records kept and completed?Q34368898
Shared antenatal care for indigenous patients in a rural and remote community.Q35094972
Continuum of care and the antenatal record in rural New South WalesQ35209636
Evaluation of an integrated community antenatal clinicQ35236747
The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures.Q35831078
Evaluation of the home-based maternal record: a WHO collaborative studyQ36669673
The quality of routinely collected maternity dataQ36712903
Patient-Held Maternal and/or Child Health Records: Meeting the Information Needs of Patients and Healthcare Providers in Developing Countries?Q36738229
'Closing the Gap': how maternity services can contribute to reducing poor maternal infant health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander womenQ37779773
Effectiveness and efficacy of antenatal careQ37783580
The nature and impact of collaboration and integrated service delivery for pregnant women, children and familiesQ37800155
Defining collaboration in Australian maternity careQ37850592
Impact of a collaborative shared antenatal care program for urban Indigenous women: a prospective cohort study.Q39716924
'Maternity clinic on the net service' and its introduction into practice: experiences of maternity-care professionalsQ40424704
Shared obstetric care: the general practitioner's perspectiveQ41105072
Electronic patient records: the view from maternityQ57769234
The Introduction of a Woman-Held Record into a Hospital Antenatal Clinic: The Bring Your Own Records StudyQ58328539
An empirical investigation into beliefs about collaborative practice among maternity care providersQ60505354
Home-based mother's record: operational feasibility, understanding and usage in a rural community in ZimbabweQ62489630
The St. Thomas's Hospital maternity case notes study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the effects of giving expectant mothers their own maternity case notesQ68848137
Sharing antenatal care: client satisfaction and use of the 'patient-held record'Q71449374
Important components of antenatal care: midwives' and obstetricians viewsQ73009171
Clinical pathways involving general practice--a new approach to integrated health care?Q73018240
Shared antenatal care--where has it been and where is it heading?Q73194733
Shared antenatal care. A regional perspectiveQ73194762
The implementation of security in distributed infant and maternity careQ73389597
Shared antenatal careQ73590366
A new vision for maternity records in Scotland: the Scottish Woman-Held Maternity Record (SWHMR) project and the electronic Scottish Woman-Held Maternity Record (eSWHMR) projectQ73684354
Obstetric record card for use in general practiceQ73887120
Hand-held maternity records: are they an added burden?Q74582222
A participatory assessment of IS integration needs in maternity clinics using activity theoryQ79437800
Shared care and boundaries: lessons from an online maternity recordQ79700528
Access to web-based personalized antenatal health records for pregnant women: a randomized controlled trialQ80498990
Research into EPRs: how midwives really feelQ81452287
Creating a collaborative culture in maternity careQ84140638
Use of technology in childbirth. 7. Electronic maternity recordsQ84286396
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 2.0 GenericQ19125117
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P921main subjectpregnant womenQ308623
electronic health recordsQ10871684
biomedical investigative techniqueQ66648976
P304page(s)52
P577publication date2014-01-30
P1433published inBMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthQ15750893
P1476titleIn a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review
P478volume14

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q90370122Early evaluation of experiences of health care providers in reception centers with a patient-held personal health record for asylum seekers: a multi-sited qualitative study in a German federal state
Q40202289Electronic Medical Record Use and Maternal and Child Care and Health
Q30834170Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory
Q92819545Home-based records for poor mothers and children in Afghanistan, a cross sectional population based study
Q49663641Making midwifery work visible: The multiple purposes of documentation
Q39066821Maternity patients' access to their electronic medical records: use and perspectives of a patient portal
Q47956971Patient portal readiness among postpartum patients in a safety net setting
Q30881323Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: how do paper hand-held records and electronic health records compare for completeness?
Q90109802The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia
Q90153118The development of a theory-based eHealth app prototype to promote oral health during prenatal care visits
Q92685000The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany
Q36087585Women's perceptions of antenatal care: are we following guideline recommended care?

Search more.