Improving the efficiency and relevance of evidence-based recommendations in the era of whole-genome sequencing: an EGAPP methods update

scientific article published on 06 September 2012

Improving the efficiency and relevance of evidence-based recommendations in the era of whole-genome sequencing: an EGAPP methods update is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1038/GIM.2012.106
P932PMC publication ID3932295
P698PubMed publication ID22955111

P50authorBenjamin DjulbegovicQ28050789
Margaret PiperQ56526469
David L VeenstraQ91864225
Stephen G. PaukerQ97318958
P2093author name stringMichael Marrone
Ned Calonge
Jennifer S Lin
Alfred O Berg
Sean R Tunis
James E Haddow
Roger Klein
Carolyn Sue Richards
P2860cites workThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationQ21092360
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ21562278
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsQ29547775
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesQ29547885
Current processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: refining evidence-based recommendation developmentQ34638937
Validation of an index of the quality of review articlesQ34762592
Stakeholder perspectives on a risk-benefit framework for genetic testingQ35546409
A formal risk-benefit framework for genomic tests: Facilitating the appropriate translation of genomics into clinical practiceQ35854145
Going from evidence to recommendationsQ36645665
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategiesQ36661809
Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviewsQ37168112
The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working GroupQ37277889
A decade of public health genomics in the United States: centers for disease control and prevention 1997-2007.Q37331241
Outcomes of interest in evidence-based evaluations of genetic testsQ37684710
Use of genomic profiling to assess risk for cardiovascular disease and identify individualized prevention strategies--a targeted evidence-based reviewQ37806581
Systematic review: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment effect modification by KRAS mutations in advanced colorectal cancerQ37825721
Horizon scanning for new genomic testsQ37828350
Systematic review of pharmacogenetic testing for predicting clinical benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.Q37903703
Decision analysis for public health: principles and illustrationsQ40211944
Decision-analytic modeling to evaluate benefits and harms of medical tests: uses and limitationsQ43861328
Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.Q52024329
The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution.Q53075951
Incorporating Patient Preferences in Evidence-Based Medicine—ReplyQ57695869
The Next Step in Guideline DevelopmentQ57695884
Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a timeQ57785176
Update on the methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: insufficient evidenceQ83288867
KRAS mutations and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancerQ83503122
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectwhole genome sequencingQ2068526
P304page(s)14-24
P577publication date2012-09-06
P1433published inGenetics in MedicineQ15765508
P1476titleImproving the efficiency and relevance of evidence-based recommendations in the era of whole-genome sequencing: an EGAPP methods update
P478volume15