Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications

scientific article published on January 2016

Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1682/JRRD.2015.12.0228
P932PMC publication ID5345485
P698PubMed publication ID28273329

P2093author name stringRobert L Askew
Brian J Hafner
Sara J Morgan
Rana Salem
P2860cites workReliability of outcome measures for people with lower-limb amputations: distinguishing true change from statistical errorQ43721091
Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related servicesQ46165453
Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical functionQ46314441
Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physical therapy practiceQ46612372
Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studiesQ47295466
Prosthetists' perceptions and use of outcome measures in clinical practice: Long-term effects of focused continuing educationQ48040977
Measures of reliability in sports medicine and scienceQ49058173
Psychometric properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputationQ51025632
Prosthetic socket fit comfort score.Q51798052
The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) ScaleQ72392752
A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instrumentsQ73898230
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trialsQ77542681
Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteriaQ80967224
What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?Q81583668
Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire rising and sitting down in lower-limb amputeesQ84634386
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two yearsQ24634716
Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013Q26786454
Mode of data elicitation, acquisition and response to surveys: a systematic reviewQ26864084
Outcome measures for individuals with multiple sclerosis: recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association Neurology Section task forceQ27015919
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliabilityQ28296226
Use of cognitive interviews in the development of the PLUS-M item bankQ33456251
Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United StatesQ34205886
Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomesQ34228559
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008Q34248542
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remediesQ34265850
Use of and confidence in administering outcome measures among clinical prosthetists: Results from a national survey and mixed-methods training programQ34514201
Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic reviewQ34766450
Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patientsQ34790020
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force reportQ35011969
An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical researchQ35104532
The neurology quality-of-life measurement initiativeQ35343088
Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programsQ35690971
Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.Q36037496
Rasch analyses of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale with individuals 50 years and older with lower-limb amputationsQ36556844
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnairesQ36680196
Measuring mobility in people with lower limb amputation: Rasch analysis of the mobility section of the prosthesis evaluation questionnaireQ36757369
The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment CenterQ36940138
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklistQ37898046
ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness researchQ38071569
Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force.Q38109122
Outcome instruments for prosthetics: clinical applications.Q38167208
The significance of clinical change and clinical change of significance: issues and methodsQ38186971
Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.Q38579640
The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessmentQ40227963
Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life.Q40846014
Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applicationsQ43605952
P433issue6
P304page(s)797-812
P577publication date2016-01-01
P1433published inJournal of Rehabilitation Research and DevelopmentQ6295842
P1476titlePsychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications
P478volume53

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q50229767A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and fixed-length short forms for the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-MTM).
Q47785116A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners.
Q49833285A study to assess whether fixed-width beam walking provides sufficient challenge to assess balance ability across lower limb prosthesis users
Q39275537Association of self-reported cognitive concerns with mobility in people with lower limb loss
Q48042272Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation
Q52603668Impact of Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis on Low Back Muscle Mechanics in Transfemoral Amputees: A Case Series.
Q50133459Laboratory- and community-based health outcomes in people with transtibial amputation using crossover and energy-storing prosthetic feet: A randomized crossover trial.
Q88753861Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees II: Comorbidities and Mobility in Lower Limb Prosthesis Users
Q90385694Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Balance Performance-Based Measures Among Adults With a Unilateral Lower-Limb Amputation

Search more.