The impact of disclosing financial ties in research and clinical care: a systematic review

scientific article published on April 2010

The impact of disclosing financial ties in research and clinical care: a systematic review is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P356DOI10.1001/ARCHINTERNMED.2010.39
P698PubMed publication ID20421551

P50authorCary P GrossQ88467914
P2093author name stringAdam Licurse
Emma Barber
Steve Joffe
P433issue8
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
P304page(s)675-682
P577publication date2010-04-01
P1433published inJAMA Internal MedicineQ177428
P1476titleThe impact of disclosing financial ties in research and clinical care: a systematic review
P478volume170

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38231479A systematic review of state and manufacturer physician payment disclosure websites: implications for implementation of the Sunshine Act.
Q96031526Bioengineering horizon scan 2020
Q34062206Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review
Q39020631Conflicts of interest in research: looking out for number one means keeping the primary interest front and center
Q26863432Disclosing conflicts of interest in patient decision aids
Q41103748Do patients and health care professionals view the communication processes of clinical research differently? A Rasch analysis from a survey
Q30783958Effect of physician disclosure of specialty bias on patient trust and treatment choice
Q37791240Ethical considerations in clinical training, care and research in psychopharmacology
Q36951441Financial Relationships between Organizations That Produce Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Biomedical Industry: A Cross-Sectional Study
Q92213794Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study
Q30613341Finding type 2 diabetes causal single nucleotide polymorphism combinations and functional modules from genome-wide association data
Q53203744In Response: Effectively addressing bias in risk assessment will require attention both to the nature of scientific objectivity and to public perceptions of research legitimacy--A perspective from academia.
Q38854764Is Industry Funding Associated with Greater Scholarly Impact Among Academic Neurosurgeons?
Q48708509It is time to move beyond a culture of unexamined assumptions, recrimination, and blame to one of systematic analysis and ethical dialogue
Q33807895Knowledge of ghostwriting and financial conflicts-of-interest reduces the perceived credibility of biomedical research.
Q34403714Knowledge of undisclosed corporate authorship ("ghostwriting") reduces the perceived credibility of antidepressant research: a randomized vignette study with experienced nurses
Q36111491Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes of Patients and the General Public towards the Interactions of Physicians with the Pharmaceutical and the Device Industry: A Systematic Review
Q42641537Making transparency matter
Q48393391Managing potential conflict of interest in journal article publication
Q28478255Medical students' exposure to and attitudes about the pharmaceutical industry: a systematic review
Q41235768Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
Q60924066Mining Open Payments Data: Analysis of Industry Payments to Thoracic Surgeons From 2014-2016
Q35964324Of money and trust in medical care redux
Q30974816Orthopaedic Surgeons Receive the Most Industry Payments to Physicians but Large Disparities are Seen in Sunshine Act Data
Q33938276Patient advocacy organizations: institutional conflicts of interest, trust, and trustworthiness
Q48048038Patient perspectives on physician conflict of interest in industry-sponsored clinical trials for multiple sclerosis therapeutics
Q36143127Patient views on financial relationships between surgeons and surgical device manufacturers
Q38818146Payments to Pediatricians in the Sunshine Act.
Q33584724Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships
Q42838485Physical activity in the UK: a unique crossroad?
Q38925837Public Awareness of and Contact With Physicians Who Receive Industry Payments: A National Survey.
Q34294990Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
Q41996052Reporting of conflicts of interest in oral presentations at medical conferences: a delegate-based prospective observational study
Q38649519Should disclosure of conflicts of interest in medicine be made public? Medical students' views
Q38373757The Effects of Public Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians on Patient Trust: A Randomized Experiment
Q35214096The Physician Payments Sunshine Act: data evaluation regarding payments to ophthalmologists
Q37307255The relationship between the physician and pharmaceutical industry: background ethics and regulation proposals
Q57989604Transparency of Conflicts of Interest: A Mixed Blessing? The Patients' Perspective
Q39527166Two years into the Sunshine Act: synopsis of opportunities, challenges, learnings, and potential implications
Q38092146Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review
Q92055074When patient advocacy organizations meet industry: a novel approach to dealing with financial conflicts of interest
Q40596702Where the Sun Shines: Industry's Payments to Transplant Surgeons.
Q87288913[Patient attitudes and expectations towards conflicts of interest of attending physicians]

Search more.