Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review

scientific article published on July 28, 2010

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S00402-010-1153-9
P953full work available at URLhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9/fulltext.html
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9.pdf
P698PubMed publication ID20665040

P2093author name stringGavin J. Macpherson
Steffen J. Breusch
P2860cites workCementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: in vitro study of pressure and temperatureQ82626928
Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designsQ82981080
Quality of life in different age groups after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplastyQ83034906
Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumoursQ83069469
Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesisQ83069556
Early return to function after hip resurfacing: is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty?Q84322000
Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplastiesQ84606671
Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacementQ84851029
Acta orthopaedica BelgicaQ27708763
Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacementQ28295628
Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritisQ33200285
Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a controlled studyQ33278186
The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparison of two approaches using Laser Doppler flowmetryQ33326397
Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow-upQ33341394
Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameterQ33393267
Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacingsQ33405175
Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?Q33518650
The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trialQ33592704
Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplastiesQ33660778
Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revisionQ33795802
Does surgical approach influence component positioning with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing?Q33971365
The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.Q33990075
Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacingsQ34790686
Sporting and physical activity following hip resurfacingQ35197527
Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns.Q35970925
Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 casesQ36082330
Background of metal-on-metal resurfacingQ36466298
Cancer incidence and causes of death among total hip replacement patients: a review based on Nordic cohorts with a special emphasis on metal-on-metal bearingsQ36466361
Serum ion level after metal-on-metal THA in patients with renal failureQ36826220
Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patient: A review of current knowledge and future strategiesQ36836409
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experienceQ36962475
Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-upQ37011493
Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approvalQ37011545
Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?Q37011652
MRI of early symptomatic metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of radiological findings in 20 hipsQ37027935
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Q37098462
Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigationQ37147883
Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plusQ37221160
Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trialQ37234185
Hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach. Surgical description and early reviewQ37234189
In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty. A review of 10 retrieved componentsQ37255988
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a consensus from the Advanced Hip Resurfacing Course, Ghent, June 2009.Q37700016
The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literatureQ37722150
Avascular necrosis associated with fracture of the femoral neck after hip resurfacing: histological assessment of femoral bone from retrieval specimens.Q37761812
The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time.Q39554917
Learning from the learning curve in total hip resurfacing: a radiographic analysisQ39881907
Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Q39904291
The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.Q39975098
Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplastyQ40430225
Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.Q40463576
Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcomeQ44878097
Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.Q45999813
The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent seriesQ46128425
Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplastyQ46185345
Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neckQ46238173
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-upQ46451628
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingementQ47213857
Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacingQ47236390
Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter resultsQ47313619
The exercise-related rise in plasma cobalt levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Q47374704
Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prosthesesQ47410732
Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development of a laboratory modelQ47410786
Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysisQ47410797
Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens.Q47410808
Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysisQ47410827
Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implantsQ47410854
Total hip resurfacing in patients who are sixty years of age or olderQ47410879
Improved survivorship of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with second-generation techniques for Crowe-I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip.Q47410896
The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacingQ47577184
Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacingQ47634550
Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacingQ47659827
Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients with metal-on-metal hip bearingsQ47878071
The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties.Q48335789
Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curveQ48480535
Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement.Q51032813
Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.Q51073129
Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.Q51124933
A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.Q51153710
Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Q51212535
Wear particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements: effects of implant design and implantation time.Q51212586
Metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty: no way under the sun!--in the affirmative.Q51415496
Anatomic considerations for the choice of surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Q51501314
The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure.Q51511123
Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips.Q51527511
Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.Q51527517
Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.Q51535482
An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements.Q51558053
Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing.Q51600516
Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis.Q51622503
Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.Q51624374
Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip.Q51624401
The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis.Q51698439
Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study.Q51739339
Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.Q51864842
Effects of soluble cobalt and cobalt incorporated into calcium phosphate layers on osteoclast differentiation and activation.Q51946811
Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study.Q51972132
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacementQ58837378
Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacingQ60194106
Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacingQ79678297
The effect of surgical approach on blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacingQ79678305
The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver studyQ80226613
Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacingQ80930997
The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacingQ81488504
Cementing technique in femoral resurfacingQ81999304
Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wearQ82378909
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)101-110
P577publication date2010-07-28
P1433published inArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryQ15758233
P1476titleMetal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review
P478volume131