| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine | |
| Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception | Q24245494 |
| In vitro fertilization may increase the risk of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome related to the abnormal imprinting of the KCN1OT gene | Q24532045 | ||
| Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19 | Q24615581 | ||
| Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART) | Q24678681 | ||
| Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials | Q28744051 | ||
| Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. | Q33205554 | ||
| Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study | Q33723461 | ||
| Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer | Q33944561 | ||
| Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer | Q34126215 | ||
| Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. | Q34146552 | ||
| Incidence of retinoblastoma in children born after in-vitro fertilisation | Q34530916 | ||
| In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos | Q34565706 | ||
| Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst transfer versus double blastocyst transfer stratified by age. | Q34953904 | ||
| The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Q34981324 | ||
| Infertility therapy-associated multiple pregnancies (births): an ongoing epidemic | Q35611726 | ||
| Replacement of one selected embryo is just as successful as two embryo transfer, without the risk of twin pregnancy | Q35626104 | ||
| Embryo morphology score on day 3 is predictive of implantation and live birth rates | Q36268448 | ||
| Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and postintervention study | Q36477504 | ||
| Multiple pregnancy associated with infertility therapy | Q36630798 | ||
| A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates | Q36816250 | ||
| Metabolomics: approaches to assessing oocyte and embryo quality. | Q36816314 | ||
| Elective single blastocyst transfer in women older than 35. | Q36825353 | ||
| Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome | Q36888265 | ||
| Clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer; single vs. double transfer. | Q36995753 | ||
| Assessment of embryo viability in assisted reproductive technology: shortcomings of current approaches and the emerging role of metabolomics | Q37156354 | ||
| Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Q37249072 | ||
| Symposium: innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Soluble human leukocyte antigen-G and pregnancy success | Q37293547 | ||
| Symposium: innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Assessing embryo viability by measurement of amino acid turnover | Q37293552 | ||
| Symposium: innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Can proteomics help to shape the future of human assisted conception? | Q37293557 | ||
| Symposium: innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Non-invasive assessment of embryo viability by metabolomic profiling of culture media ('metabolomics'). | Q37293562 | ||
| The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Q37300758 | ||
| Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice | Q37314404 | ||
| Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects | Q37361933 | ||
| Evaluation of epigenetic marks in human embryos derived from IVF and ICSI. | Q42969099 | ||
| Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective | Q43550851 | ||
| Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential | Q43813768 | ||
| Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial | Q43839304 | ||
| Imprinting diseases and IVF: Danish National IVF cohort study | Q45234421 | ||
| Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study | Q47637816 | ||
| Significant reduction of twins with single embryo transfer in IVF. | Q47850097 | ||
| Factors affecting patients' attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer | Q48424600 | ||
| Acceptance of single-embryo transfer by patients | Q48425620 | ||
| The desire of infertile patients for multiple births | Q48553643 | ||
| Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation | Q48777886 | ||
| Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme | Q48849873 | ||
| Influence of patient age on the growth and transfer of blastocyst-stage embryos | Q48864205 | ||
| Single embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rate reduction in IVF/ICSI: a 5-year appraisal | Q49027521 | ||
| Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who's afraid of single embryo transfer? | Q49171695 | ||
| Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. | Q50644739 | ||
| Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer | Q50660361 | ||
| Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation | Q50715065 | ||
| Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome? | Q53343628 | ||
| Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis | Q53845424 | ||
| Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate | Q53999820 | ||
| Elective Single-Embryo Transfer versus Double-Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization | Q61847454 | ||
| Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer | Q61847455 | ||
| Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strategies in England | Q63359660 | ||
| Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology? | Q64134335 | ||
| Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction | Q71130437 | ||
| Infertility: The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns | Q72017287 | ||
| Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial | Q73098255 | ||
| One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study | Q74439764 | ||
| Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion | Q74757708 | ||
| Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer | Q78198566 | ||
| Guidelines on number of embryos transferred | Q79285656 | ||
| New Belgian embryo transfer policy leads to sharp decrease in multiple pregnancy rate | Q79433484 | ||
| Prospective evaluation of the optimal time for selecting a single embryo for transfer: day 3 versus day 5 | Q79755771 | ||
| Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial | Q79811178 | ||
| Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments | Q80272405 | ||
| Shared-risk or refund programs in assisted reproduction | Q80555856 | ||
| Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer - a questionnaire study | Q80981739 | ||
| Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles | Q81023330 | ||
| Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial | Q81196083 | ||
| Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women | Q81383955 | ||
| In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial | Q81411091 | ||
| Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals | Q81484838 | ||
| [Single embryo transfer does not compromise the pregnancy rate in patients with good IVF/ICSI prognosis] | Q81485905 | ||
| Cost efficiency of reducing multiple births | Q81573525 | ||
| Elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in assisted reproduction | Q81616497 | ||
| Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates | Q81636770 | ||
| Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women | Q81636773 | ||
| New Belgian legislation regarding the limitation of transferable embryos in in vitro fertilization cycles does not significantly influence the pregnancy rate but reduces the multiple pregnancy rate in a threefold way in the Leuven University Fertili | Q81706937 | ||
| Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome | Q81759611 | ||
| Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey | Q81937964 | ||
| Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems | Q82657369 | ||
| Effect of the new legislation and single-embryo transfer policy in Turkey on assisted reproduction outcomes: preliminary results | Q83080132 | ||
| Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years | Q83894371 | ||
| Guidelines on number of embryos transferred | Q84739569 | ||
| Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred | Q94387869 | ||
| P433 | issue | 4 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | single embryo transfer | Q100975127 |
| P304 | page(s) | 835-842 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2011-12-22 | |
| P1433 | published in | Fertility and Sterility | Q15724525 |
| P1476 | title | Elective single-embryo transfer | |
| P478 | volume | 97 |
| Q38968574 | "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients. |
| Q38649632 | A meta-analysis of neonatal health outcomes from oocyte donation. |
| Q90564342 | A subspecialty of the assisted reproductive technologies: cryogenic inventory maintenance |
| Q92799814 | A systematic review of database validation studies among fertility populations |
| Q35561404 | Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle |
| Q38969629 | Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014. |
| Q56601416 | Association between assisted reproductive technology conception and autism in California, 1997-2007 |
| Q38754987 | Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer |
| Q38055459 | Best practices of ASRM and ESHRE: a journey through reproductive medicine |
| Q92948326 | Biologically Coupled Gate Field-Effect Transistors Meet in Vitro Diagnostics |
| Q37444447 | Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches |
| Q85263675 | Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion |
| Q34603935 | Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study. |
| Q28080756 | Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach |
| Q61413177 | Dichorionic Triamniotic Triplet Pregnancy Complicated by Twin Anemia Polycythemia Sequence: The Place of Fetal Therapy |
| Q37671829 | Dizygotic twin pregnancy after single embryo transfer: a case report and review of the literature |
| Q36977859 | Effect of maternal chronic disease on obstetric complications in twin pregnancies in a United States cohort |
| Q37478371 | Effect of mesenchymal stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts on the development of preimplantation mouse embryos. |
| Q64130187 | Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: A systematic review |
| Q30747725 | Efficacy, safety, and trends in assisted reproductive technology in Japan-analysis of four-year data from the national registry system |
| Q38590592 | Elective Single Embryo Transfer: an update to UK Best Practice Guidelines |
| Q48526636 | Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age. |
| Q36156218 | Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome--United States, 1999 to 2010 |
| Q26995448 | Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring |
| Q36165380 | Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention |
| Q39061170 | Embryo wastage rates remain high in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a look at the trends from 2004-2013 in the USA. |
| Q54984577 | Equivalency of In vitro fertilization Success Rates in Elective Single Blastocyst Transfer and Elective Double Blastocyst Transfer: An Example of Equivalence Methodology in Clinical Reproductive Health |
| Q58715024 | Factors affecting the live-birth rate in women with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing IVF-ET |
| Q37605743 | Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles |
| Q33746543 | Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012. |
| Q38896819 | Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer |
| Q36697820 | Fertilization rate and its determinants in intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
| Q92084501 | Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
| Q46811017 | Impact of ART on pregnancies in California: an analysis of maternity outcomes and insights into the added burden of neonatal intensive care |
| Q48114636 | Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Q33767748 | Live birth after fresh versus frozen single blastocyst transfer (Frefro-blastocyst): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
| Q64137312 | Live birth and multiple birth rates in US in vitro fertilization treatment using donor oocytes: a comparison of single-embryo transfer and double-embryo transfer |
| Q91971401 | Management of Women With an Unexpected Low Ovarian Response to Gonadotropin |
| Q43704341 | Multiple pregnancy, fetal reduction and selective termination |
| Q43737372 | Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy |
| Q90597789 | Novel Physiology and Definition of Poor Ovarian Response; Clinical Recommendations |
| Q24201012 | Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection |
| Q36165310 | Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome |
| Q36828940 | Number of supernumerary vitrified blastocysts is positively correlated with implantation and live birth in single-blastocyst embryo transfers |
| Q41034248 | Obstetric and perinatal outcome from single cleavage transfer and single blastocyst transfer: a matched case-control study |
| Q34113005 | Obstetric outcomes of monochorionic pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective study |
| Q38870388 | Predictors of treatment failure in young patients undergoing in vitro fertilization |
| Q38180208 | Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction |
| Q34885972 | Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterin |
| Q48644233 | Prevention of multiple pregnancies in infertility treatment |
| Q33654803 | Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
| Q47199366 | Reduced live-birth rates after IVF/ICSI in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: results of a multicentre cohort study. |
| Q43476409 | Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction |
| Q38154416 | Selecting the ‘best’ embryos: prospects for improvement |
| Q49679151 | Should Clinicians Set Limits on Reproductive Autonomy? |
| Q46349317 | Sibling embryo blastocyst development as a prognostic factor for the outcome of day-3 embryo transfer |
| Q47162695 | Single Blastocyst Transfer: The Key to Reduce Multiple Pregnancy Rates Without Compromising the Live Birth Rate |
| Q45843503 | Single Embryo-Coupled Gate Field Effect Transistor for Elective Single Embryo Transfer |
| Q88961862 | Split happens: a case of consecutive monozygotic twin pregnancies following elective single-embryo transfer in a 40-year old woman using donor oocytes |
| Q92998491 | Spontaneous Conception during In Vitro Fertilization prior to Embryo Transfer without the Opportunity for Preimplantation Genetic Testing |
| Q37576376 | Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013. |
| Q90250364 | The Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register (CARTR) Plus database: a validation study |
| Q35100099 | The Desire for Multiple Pregnancy among Patients with Infertility and Their Partners |
| Q31111724 | The German Middleway as Precursor for Single Embryo Transfer. A Retrospective Data-analysis of the Düsseldorf University Hospital's Interdisciplinary Fertility Centre - UniKiD. |
| Q36407594 | The Multiple Birth Epidemic: Revisited |
| Q63358996 | The addition of a low-quality embryo as part of a fresh day 3 double embryo transfer does not improve ongoing pregnancy rates |
| Q48602718 | The association between embryo quality and perinatal outcome of singletons born after single embryo transfers: a pilot study |
| Q91708379 | The impact of single versus double blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcomes: A prospective, randomized control trial |
| Q64126670 | Trends and Outcomes for Donor Oocyte Cycles in the United States, 2000-2010 |
| Q34962700 | Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience |
Search more.