scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1111/J.1467-9566.2011.01441.X |
P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_ies4fvn4bzbvlc6zxxjaw2xveu |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 22369578 |
P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 221865793 |
P50 | author | Natalie Armstrong | Q57686516 |
Helen Eborall | Q61472756 | ||
P2860 | cites work | Screening for breast cancer with mammography | Q24240411 |
Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial | Q28752193 | ||
'With the best of reasons': cervical cancer prevention policy and the suppression of sexual risk factor information. | Q33659177 | ||
"It's just part of being a woman": cervical screening, the body and femininity | Q33812190 | ||
Screening for breast cancer--balancing the debate | Q34122571 | ||
The potential social impact of predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to common chronic diseases: a review and proposed research agenda | Q34413160 | ||
Enacting genetic responsibility: experiences of mothers who carry the fragile X gene | Q34671992 | ||
The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review | Q36078201 | ||
Information about screening - is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? | Q37331266 | ||
Women's lay knowledge of cervical cancer/cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics | Q38549926 | ||
Screening for breast cancer: candidacy and compliance | Q39667791 | ||
Mapping the field of medical sociology: a comparative analysis of journals | Q40079641 | ||
Embodied risk: my body, myself? | Q40870102 | ||
Health checks in general practice: the patient's response | Q41100943 | ||
Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making | Q42638669 | ||
Providers' constructions of the role of women in cervical cancer screening in Bulgaria and Romania | Q47212806 | ||
Public accountability of newborn screening: collective knowing and deciding | Q47415690 | ||
Towards a sociology of diagnosis: reflections and opportunities | Q48605146 | ||
Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process | Q48668140 | ||
The psychosocial impact of mass screening for cardiovascular risk factors | Q48953794 | ||
'It's something for you both to think about': choice and decision making in nuchal translucency screening for Down's syndrome | Q50135148 | ||
Screening for breast cancer: Medicalization, visualization and the embodied experience | Q50537342 | ||
Health professionals, their medical interventions and uncertainty: a study focusing on women at midlife. | Q50750217 | ||
Illness representations and coping following an abnormal colorectal cancer screening result. | Q50781099 | ||
'It's them faulty genes again': women, men and the gendered nature of genetic responsibility in prenatal blood screening. | Q51671038 | ||
Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK. | Q51903596 | ||
Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening. | Q53297109 | ||
Increasing attendance at colorectal cancer screening: Testing the efficacy of a mailed, psychoeducational intervention in a community sample of older adults | Q57078734 | ||
How medical specialists appraise three controversial health innovations: scientific, clinical and social arguments | Q58136605 | ||
Blood is thicker than water: Genetic testing as citizenship through familial obligation and the management of risk | Q59160569 | ||
P433 | issue | 2 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 161-176 | |
P577 | publication date | 2012-02-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Sociology of Health and Illness | Q7552840 |
P1476 | title | The sociology of medical screening: past, present and future | |
P478 | volume | 34 |
Q35227945 | A qualitative investigation of non-response in NHS health checks |
Q36898947 | Biomarkers, the molecular gaze and the transformation of cancer survivorship |
Q60622257 | Deriving a clinical prediction rule to target sexual healthcare to women attending British General Practices |
Q50163443 | From medicalisation to riskisation: governing early childhood development |
Q92966277 | Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer: Responsibilization in public health genomics |
Q38369666 | Putting public health infrastructures to the test: Introducing HPV vaccination in Austria and the Netherlands. |
Q26784106 | Randomised trials in context: practical problems and social aspects of evidence-based medicine and policy |
Q36168656 | Saving Deaf Children? Screening for Hearing loss as a Public-interest Case |
Q42727399 | The nuanced negative: Meanings of a negative diagnostic result in clinical exome sequencing |
Q48084604 | The risk experience: the social effects of health screening and the emergence of a proto-illness |
Q41014655 | Trust, choice and obligation: a qualitative study of enablers of colorectal cancer screening in South Australia |
Q47402372 | Why do women seek ultrasound scans from commercial providers during pregnancy? |
Search more.