| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Heather Skirton | Q42416963 |
| P2093 | author name string | A O'Connor | |
| L Jackson | |||
| L Goldsmith | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories | Q24635266 |
| Using thematic analysis in psychology | Q30476519 | ||
| Direct to consumer genetic testing: Avoiding a culture war | Q34060535 | ||
| Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users | Q34289712 | ||
| Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers | Q34379754 | ||
| Statement of the ESHG on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes | Q34410226 | ||
| Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests | Q36636219 | ||
| American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility | Q37672016 | ||
| Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: ethical-legal perspectives and practical considerations | Q43525322 | ||
| ASHG Statement* on Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in the United States | Q47152448 | ||
| Regulating direct-to-consumer genetic tests: What is all the fuss about? | Q57314152 | ||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P921 | main subject | systematic review | Q1504425 |
| P304 | page(s) | 210-218 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2012-04-08 | |
| P1433 | published in | Clinical Genetics | Q5133760 |
| P1476 | title | Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations | |
| P478 | volume | 82 |
| Q31132459 | All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms. |
| Q36675455 | An overview of the genomics of metabolic syndrome. |
| Q36789414 | Attitudes About Regulation Among Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Customers |
| Q56889685 | Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study |
| Q40872861 | Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers |
| Q36773744 | Dealing with the unexpected: consumer responses to direct-access BRCA mutation testing |
| Q35780095 | Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts--should health professionals be concerned? |
| Q36374715 | Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for predicting sports performance and talent identification: Consensus statement |
| Q35460118 | Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Slovenia: availability, ethical dilemmas and legislation |
| Q35351251 | Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy |
| Q38951129 | Ethical issues in the evaluation of adults with suspected genetic neuromuscular disorders. |
| Q42790213 | Fair allocation of health-care resources: finding a model that does not disenfranchise users of genetic services. A commentary on Rogowski et al.... |
| Q31056421 | Future Perspectives of Personalized Weight Loss Interventions Based on Nutrigenetic, Epigenetic, and Metagenomic Data |
| Q26830861 | Genetic data and electronic health records: a discussion of ethical, logistical and technological considerations |
| Q45759768 | Genomic Testing: The Clinical Laboratory Perspective |
| Q39261577 | Guidance for patients considering direct-to-consumer genetic testing and health professionals involved in their care: development of a practical decision tool. |
| Q36998724 | Harm, hype and evidence: ELSI research and policy guidance |
| Q26775070 | Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review |
| Q37725784 | Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study |
| Q100724559 | Knowledge, opinions, and expectations of adults concerning personalised genotype-based dietary recommendations: a German survey |
| Q38232771 | Next generation sequencing and the future of genetic diagnosis |
| Q51461502 | Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake. |
| Q34483451 | Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents |
| Q35938154 | Preconception counseling: do patients learn about genetics from their obstetrician gynecologists? |
| Q47610347 | Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk |
| Q41889955 | Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests from four state population-based surveys, and implications for clinical and public health practice |
| Q39247845 | Public reaction to direct-to-consumer online genetic tests: Comparing attitudes, trust and intentions across commercial and conventional providers |
| Q52677957 | Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions |
| Q42693470 | The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper |
| Q30249029 | The effect of communicating the genetic risk of cardiometabolic disorders on motivation and actual engagement in preventative lifestyle modification and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. |
| Q31115480 | Use of big data in drug development for precision medicine |
| Q42280283 | What is a good health check? An interview study of health check providers' views and practices |
Search more.