| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1111/J.1748-720X.2012.00724.X |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 23289698 |
| P2093 | author name string | Emily E Anderson | |
| James M DuBois | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Research Participants' Perceptions of the Certificate of Confidentiality's Assurances and Limitations. | Q53055327 |
| Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. | Q53377795 | ||
| Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking | Q56780965 | ||
| Sicily statement on evidence-based practice | Q21254633 | ||
| Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving | Q24645786 | ||
| Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't | Q24655756 | ||
| Public perspectives regarding data-sharing practices in genomics research | Q28742475 | ||
| Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research | Q28754402 | ||
| Hidden data for research ethicists: an introduction to the concept and a series of papers | Q33433641 | ||
| The role of empirical research in bioethics | Q33677981 | ||
| Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing | Q33678672 | ||
| Critical appraisal of therapeutic interventions in the intensive care unit: human monoclonal antibody treatment in sepsis. Journal Club of the Hamilton Regional Critical Care Group | Q33857147 | ||
| Paying research subjects: an analysis of current policies | Q34549837 | ||
| Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments | Q34552539 | ||
| Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). | Q34788539 | ||
| IRB Member Judgments of Decisional Capacity, Coercion, and Risk in Medical and Psychiatric Studies | Q35082901 | ||
| The effects of local review on informed consent documents from a multicenter clinical trials consortium. | Q35131798 | ||
| Characteristics of medical school faculty members serving on institutional review boards: results of a national survey | Q35198363 | ||
| A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn | Q35606493 | ||
| Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives | Q35649408 | ||
| Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement | Q35907331 | ||
| Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review | Q35910160 | ||
| Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research | Q36291530 | ||
| Empirical research on research ethics | Q36453958 | ||
| A qualitative study of non-affiliated, non-scientist institutional review board members | Q36530123 | ||
| Variability in the costs of institutional review board oversight | Q36547107 | ||
| The need for evidence-based research ethics: a review of the substance abuse literature | Q36576210 | ||
| Determining risk in pediatric research with no prospect of direct benefit: time for a national consensus on the interpretation of federal regulations. | Q36762145 | ||
| Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards | Q36773946 | ||
| Higher magnitude cash payments improve research follow-up rates without increasing drug use or perceived coercion | Q36778313 | ||
| The influence of monetary compensation on relapse among addicted participants: empirical vs. anecdotal evidence | Q37179225 | ||
| A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics | Q37199138 | ||
| Multimedia consent for research in people with schizophrenia and normal subjects: a randomized controlled trial | Q37227459 | ||
| Participation in biomedical research studies and cancer screenings: perceptions of risks to minorities compared with whites | Q37242057 | ||
| The ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants with pregnant women: a systematic review | Q37335786 | ||
| Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies | Q37429126 | ||
| Assessing and improving research participants' understanding of risk: potential lessons from the literature on physician-patient risk communication | Q37455006 | ||
| A Review of Paying Research Participants: It's Time to Move Beyond the ethical Debate | Q37455079 | ||
| Evaluating the risks of clinical research | Q37798095 | ||
| A proposal and prototype for a Research Risk Repository to improve the protection of research participants | Q37920971 | ||
| What counts as empirical research in bioethics and where do we find the stuff? | Q39618880 | ||
| Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions | Q40080444 | ||
| Respondent reactions to sensitive questions | Q40179193 | ||
| Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want? | Q40434940 | ||
| Assessing social risks prior to commencement of a clinical trial: due diligence or ethical inflation? | Q43250756 | ||
| Protecting research subjects--the crisis at Johns Hopkins | Q43899726 | ||
| The problem of privacy in transcultural research: reflections on an ethnographic study in Sri Lanka | Q47211010 | ||
| Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank | Q48076854 | ||
| The subjective experience of participation in schizophrenia research: a practical and ethical issue | Q48211264 | ||
| Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: a call to action for a scientifically informed approach | Q48683072 | ||
| P433 | issue | 4 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | institutional review board | Q362104 |
| research ethics | Q1132684 | ||
| decision making | Q1331926 | ||
| ethical analysis | Q98139384 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 951-969 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2012-01-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics | Q15760852 |
| P1476 | title | IRB decision-making with imperfect knowledge: a framework for evidence-based research ethics review | |
| P478 | volume | 40 |
| Q36847484 | An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs |
| Q92122847 | Banking the Future: Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Biobank Research |
| Q21183957 | ELSI practices in genomic research in East Asia: implications for research collaboration and public participation |
| Q28595722 | Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research |
| Q39049219 | Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process |
| Q47104495 | Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review |
| Q38974025 | Rethinking risk assessment for emerging technology first-in-human trials |
| Q59336332 | Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol |
Search more.