Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

scientific article published on 11 February 2013

Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis is …
instance of (P31):
meta-analysisQ815382
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1017/S1461145712001691
P698PubMed publication ID23399312
P5875ResearchGate publication ID235521126

P50authorHannah BroadbentQ58626440
P2093author name stringFrederique Van den Eynde
Marcelo T Berlim
P2860cites workStatistics notes: blinding in clinical trials and other studiesQ24524794
Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).Q24602982
Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and researchQ24606718
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological studyQ24653790
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testQ24685585
Transcranial magnetic brain stimulation: therapeutic promises and scientific gapsQ26830799
Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysisQ27860511
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsQ27860735
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ27860868
Sham or real—Post hoc estimation of stimulation condition in a randomized transcranial magnetic stimulation trialQ60636616
Transcranial magnetic stimulation—a sandwich coil design for a better shamQ60686019
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Sequential Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant DepressionQ60732619
A randomized controlled trial with 4-month follow-up of adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex for depressionQ62612282
Introduction to Meta-AnalysisQ106417732
Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatmentsQ28469142
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some "sham" forms active?Q33891107
Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentialsQ33940055
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and metaanalysisQ34013833
Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders.Q34021924
Blinding success of rTMS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in randomised sham-controlled trials: a systematic reviewQ34172513
Somatic treatments for mood disordersQ34221699
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression and other psychiatric disorders.Q34420251
Approaches to heterogeneity in meta‐analysisQ34464717
Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis.Q34677630
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression. Systematic review and meta-analysisQ35141247
Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trialsQ35648461
A review of the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment for depression, and current and future strategies to optimize efficacyQ36247983
Bias in clinical intervention research.Q36380552
Report by the ACNP Task Force on response and remission in major depressive disorderQ36516394
Factors modifying the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a review.Q36694600
Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigatedQ36888653
Has repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for depression improved? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the recent vs. the earlier rTMS studiesQ36892838
Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation systemQ37181335
Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?Q37181942
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: a reviewQ37272788
Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysisQ37329334
Quantitative review of the efficacy of slow-frequency magnetic brain stimulation in major depressive disorderQ37681666
The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: a new synthesis of methodological issuesQ37769784
Controversy: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation shows efficacy in treating psychiatric diseases (depression, mania, schizophrenia, obsessive-complusive disorder, panic, posttraumatic stress disordQ37773018
Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analysesQ37849755
Clinical trial design in non-invasive brain stimulation psychiatric research.Q37871523
Blinding in randomized clinical trials: imposed impartialityQ37945039
Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trialQ38373834
Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.Q43810883
Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment of depression in bipolar affective disorder: a pilot study of acute safety and efficacyQ44375860
A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant major depressionQ46684565
A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).Q48328153
Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the management of mood disordersQ48819029
A randomized double-blind sham-controlled comparison of unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depressionQ48830665
A sham-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of twice-daily rTMS in major depressionQ50915417
Meta-analysis of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat depression.Q52979252
Systematic Reviews in Health CareQ56528741
P433issue5
P304page(s)1173-1181
P577publication date2013-02-11
P1433published inThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologyQ7742309
P1476titleBlinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
P478volume16

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q44090465Accelerated HF-rTMS in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: Insights from subgenual anterior cingulate functional connectivity
Q43790844Antidepressant Efficacy of High and Low Frequency rTMS at 110% of Motor Threshold versus Sham Stimulation over Left Prefrontal Cortex
Q49797831Both active and sham low-frequency rTMS single sessions over the right DLPFC decrease cue-induced cravings among pathological gamblers seeking treatment: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial
Q38620900Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in eating disorders: An open-label case series.
Q48296705Efficacy of prefrontal theta-burst stimulation in refractory depression: a randomized sham-controlled study
Q38968671MRI-guided dmPFC-rTMS as a Treatment for Treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder
Q33604899More female patients and fewer stimuli per session are associated with the short-term antidepressant properties of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): a meta-analysis of 54 sham-controlled studies published between 1997-2013
Q45072455Preventing relapse to smoking with transcranial magnetic stimulation: Feasibility and potential efficacy
Q34341099Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD): An exploratory meta-analysis of randomized and sham-controlled trials
Q34211733Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for treating posttraumatic stress disorder: an exploratory meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials
Q34333771Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials
Q21129122Rethinking the role of sham TMS.
Q30893498Short-term efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in depression- reanalysis of data from meta-analyses up to 2010.
Q64255714The Effect of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Emotion Processing, Reappraisal, and Craving in Alcohol Use Disorder Patients and Healthy Controls: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Q35752076The Impact of Accelerated Right Prefrontal High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Cue-Reactivity: An fMRI Study on Craving in Recently Detoxified Alcohol-Dependent Patients
Q34388951Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of substance addiction

Search more.