| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1093/CID/CIT333 |
| P953 | full work available at URL | http://academic.oup.com/cid/article-pdf/57/5/725/17852969/cit333.pdf |
| https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-pdf/57/5/725/17852969/cit333.pdf | ||
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 23697745 |
| P5875 | ResearchGate publication ID | 236931707 |
| P2093 | author name string | Craig A. Umscheid | |
| P2860 | cites work | Annals of Internal Medicine | Q564416 |
| Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions | Q21254606 | ||
| Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test | Q24685585 | ||
| Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement | Q27860537 | ||
| Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses | Q27860655 | ||
| Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials | Q27860735 | ||
| Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? | Q27860973 | ||
| Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials | Q74121809 | ||
| A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations | Q74545500 | ||
| Using advanced search tools on PubMed for citation retrieval | Q80839803 | ||
| Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service | Q81517642 | ||
| Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews | Q29547775 | ||
| Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature | Q29614233 | ||
| Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography | Q29615697 | ||
| The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis | Q29619369 | ||
| Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews | Q29619492 | ||
| Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? | Q30039684 | ||
| Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head | Q30670986 | ||
| Case study of the comparison of data from conference abstracts and full-text articles in health technology assessment of rapidly evolving technologies: does it make a difference? | Q31061524 | ||
| Procalcitonin to Guide Duration of Antimicrobial Therapy in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review | Q34027944 | ||
| Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. | Q34036655 | ||
| Hospital-based comparative effectiveness centers: translating research into practice to improve the quality, safety and value of patient care | Q34332780 | ||
| Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? | Q34334544 | ||
| Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms | Q34427903 | ||
| Searching the medical literature using PubMed: a tutorial | Q35045649 | ||
| Chapter 3: Choosing the Important Outcomes for a Systematic Review of a Medical Test | Q35999009 | ||
| Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement | Q36021512 | ||
| Better information for better health care: the Evidence-based Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality | Q36169143 | ||
| Meta-Analysis. Potentials and promise | Q36247297 | ||
| Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures | Q36247440 | ||
| The integrative review: updated methodology | Q36305873 | ||
| Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies | Q36860588 | ||
| Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated | Q36888653 | ||
| Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies | Q37150008 | ||
| AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program | Q37286390 | ||
| AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program | Q37525304 | ||
| Updating the guideline development methodology of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). | Q37684081 | ||
| Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research | Q37801836 | ||
| Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program | Q37863325 | ||
| Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program | Q37891424 | ||
| Chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of PICOTS, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks | Q38014769 | ||
| Chapter 8: Meta-analysis of Test Performance When There is a “Gold Standard” | Q38014770 | ||
| Barriers to influenza immunization in a low-income urban population | Q39555511 | ||
| Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists | Q40996403 | ||
| Bias in location and selection of studies | Q41694445 | ||
| In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias | Q51967379 | ||
| Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative | Q52915135 | ||
| What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? | Q52925799 | ||
| Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study | Q52938193 | ||
| Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German | Q53358085 | ||
| The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States | Q72131665 | ||
| P433 | issue | 5 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | meta-analysis | Q815382 |
| systematic review | Q1504425 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | 725-734 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2013-05-22 | |
| P1433 | published in | Clinical Infectious Diseases | Q5133764 |
| P1476 | title | A Primer on Performing Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses | |
| P478 | volume | 57 |
| Q92530950 | Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review |
| Q64240090 | Factors associated with smoking cessation and smoking cessation interventions in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries |
| Q64924401 | Risk Factors for Falls in Adult Cancer Survivors: An Integrative Review. |
| Q27000197 | Self-transfer and mortality amongst adults lost to follow-up in ART programmes in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q38851853 | Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Haptoglobin, Serum Amyloid A, and Fibrinogen versus Clinical Reference Standards for the Diagnosis of Bovine Respiratory Disease |
| Q33837518 | The treatment cascade for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q40263375 | Trials and tribulations of a meta-analyst |
Search more.