Acute appendicitis can be treated with single-incision laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

scientific article

Acute appendicitis can be treated with single-incision laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials is …
instance of (P31):
meta-analysisQ815382
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1111/CODI.12839
P698PubMed publication ID25406831

P50authorR CirocchiQ84221613
Mario MorinoQ38543864
P2093author name stringJ Randolph
N Vettoretto
P2860cites workThe interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models.Q40373458
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled studyQ42282604
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: an initial experience using a novel techniqueQ45884532
Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy.Q50873874
Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique.Q52864122
Meta-analysis in clinical trialsQ27860779
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?Q27860973
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a surveyQ30004207
A prospective randomized comparison of single-port laparoscopic procedure with open and standard 3-port laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of acute appendicitisQ33457052
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysisQ33604938
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM GroupQ34089161
Single-incision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysisQ34371855
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Q34480592
Single incision laparoscopic surgery in general surgery: a reviewQ36014164
Teaching single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patientsQ36573528
Consensus conference on laparoscopic appendectomy: development of guidelinesQ37886277
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of cautionQ38016049
Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), SocQ38021952
P433issue4
P921main subjectappendicitisQ121041
laparoscopyQ675754
P304page(s)281-289
P577publication date2015-04-01
P1433published inColorectal DiseaseQ15764230
P1476titleAcute appendicitis can be treated with single-incision laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
P478volume17

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q48274097Glove port, how do we do it? A low-cost alternative to the single-port approach.
Q36165719Interventions to optimize recovery after laparoscopic appendectomy: a scoping review
Q42621120SILA: not necessarily the next step? Response to: acute appendicitis can be treated with single-incision laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Q42553096Single-incision port-site herniation: meta-analysis vs. nationwide cohort study.
Q38914801Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer

Search more.