Improving quality through clinical registries in urology

scientific article

Improving quality through clinical registries in urology is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1097/MOU.0000000000000406
P932PMC publication ID5567830
P698PubMed publication ID28441270

P2093author name stringDaniel A Barocas
Mark D Tyson
P2860cites workContemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.Q30366082
A Statewide Intervention to Reduce Hospitalizations after Prostate Biopsy.Q30373975
Notable Outcomes and Trackable Events after Surgery: Evaluating an Uncomplicated Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy.Q30384919
Variation in the use of postoperative radiotherapy among high-risk patients following radical prostatectomy.Q30385364
Understanding the Use of Prostate Biopsy Among Men with Limited Life Expectancy in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.Q30387314
Variation in Guideline Concordant Active Surveillance Followup in Diverse Urology PracticesQ30393322
A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complicationsQ30574624
Accuracy of administrative data in trauma: splenic injuries as an exampleQ30617549
Clinical versus administrative data bases for CABG surgery. Does it matter?Q30861800
Immediate versus deferred initiation of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients with PSA-only relapse. An observational follow-up studyQ35470434
Prostate cancer 2004: insights from national disease registries.Q35939418
Fifteen years of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in reviewQ37624024
Clinical registries and quality measurement in surgery: a systematic review.Q38330557
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer OutcomesQ40430805
Venous thromboembolism after urological surgeryQ42646461
Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramQ45334119
Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk StudyQ45335225
Impact of age on quality-of-life outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancerQ46380673
Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomyQ46689693
The effects of adjusting for case mix on mortality and length of stay following radical cystectomyQ80212558
P433issue4
P304page(s)375-379
P577publication date2017-07-01
P1433published inCurrent Opinion in UrologyQ15746610
P1476titleImproving quality through clinical registries in urology
P478volume27

Reverse relations

Q38598365Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registrycites workP2860

Search more.