| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1028727637 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.3758/BF03196595 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 15376795 |
| P2093 | author name string | Laurie A Manwell | |
| Derek Besner | |||
| Martha Anne Roberts | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review | Q34021872 |
| On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: which cognitions press your buttons? | Q34444264 | ||
| Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory? | Q38414714 | ||
| When are morphemic and semantic priming observed in visual word recognition? | Q38434075 | ||
| Semantic processing in visual word recognition: activation blocking and domain specificity | Q38436155 | ||
| The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm | Q38438892 | ||
| Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition | Q38440515 | ||
| Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention | Q38443905 | ||
| Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing | Q38451200 | ||
| Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks. | Q38451762 | ||
| Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation | Q38453617 | ||
| The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity | Q38456115 | ||
| The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing | Q38496893 | ||
| Working memory and stroop interference: an individual differences investigation. | Q45959894 | ||
| What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? | Q52010885 | ||
| Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"? | Q52012372 | ||
| Priming effects that span an intervening unrelated word: implications for models of memory representation and retrieval. | Q52076008 | ||
| Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing. | Q52110428 | ||
| Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference. | Q52111510 | ||
| Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions | Q55882047 | ||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 458-462 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2004-06-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Psychonomic Bulletin and Review | Q15763410 |
| P1476 | title | Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect | |
| P478 | volume | 11 |
| Q61817330 | A functional MRI investigation of crossmodal interference in an audiovisual Stroop task |
| Q81480214 | An optimal viewing position effect in the Stroop task when only one letter is the color carrier |
| Q38415720 | Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics |
| Q38236987 | Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task |
| Q38395635 | Congruency effects in the letter search task: semantic activation in the absence of priming |
| Q52035974 | Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect. |
| Q87893589 | Depth of processing in the stroop task: evidence from a novel forced-reading condition |
| Q38394378 | Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines. |
| Q38385121 | Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm |
| Q38389030 | On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention |
| Q38496688 | Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect. |
| Q49669389 | Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference |
| Q38382958 | Stroop effects on redemption and semantic effects on confession: simultaneous automatic activation of embedded and carrier words |
| Q38477352 | Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task. |
| Q93088026 | The Loci of Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects With Manual and Vocal Responses |
| Q38384202 | The eyes fixate the optimal viewing position of task-irrelevant words. |
| Q57771293 | The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention |
| Q38395573 | The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis |
| Q38501112 | Viewing-position effects in the Stroop task: Initial fixation position modulates Stroop effects in fully colored words |
Search more.