Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications

scientific article published on 3 May 2016

Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1019269112
P356DOI10.1007/S10620-016-4177-3
P698PubMed publication ID27142669

P2093author name stringHong Li
Sheena Patel
Kevin Ollington
Vishal Desai
Joshua Melson
Daniel A Sussman
Michael Greenspan
Sandeep Dayanand
P2860cites workUse of open access in GI endoscopy at an academic medical centerQ30481995
Diagnostic yield of open access colonoscopy according to appropriatenessQ30482210
Appropriateness of colonoscopy in a digestive endoscopy unit: a prospective study using ASGE guidelinesQ30484074
Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?Q30487638
Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice.Q33618261
Findings on serial surveillance colonoscopy in patients with low-risk polyps on initial colonoscopyQ33687986
The impact of bowel cleansing on follow-up recommendations in average-risk patients with a normal colonoscopyQ33965988
Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare populationQ34183803
What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rateQ35580936
Barriers to screening colonoscopy for low-income Latino and white patients in an urban community health centerQ36840634
Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trialQ37241456
Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national surveyQ37526072
Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002).Q37739029
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ38023997
Clinical decision support with natural language processing facilitates determination of colonoscopy surveillance intervals.Q38169451
Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic proceduresQ38283914
The impact of national guidelines on the waiting list for colonoscopy: a quantitative clinical auditQ38571388
Patterns of endoscopy use in the United StatesQ40775931
Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare SystemQ41630832
Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand.Q46013637
Colon polyp surveillance: clinical decision tool.Q54545525
Open-access endoscopyQ56768865
Optimizing Adequacy of Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ59705143
Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyQ73501183
Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behaviorQ79885533
Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomyQ80458384
Quality indicators for colonoscopyQ95613902
P433issue9
P921main subjectcolonoscopyQ840387
clinical indicationQ110971784
P304page(s)2496-2504
P577publication date2016-05-03
P1433published inDigestive Diseases and SciencesQ15716711
P1476titleMost Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications
P478volume61