scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | René H Gifford | Q88535438 |
P2093 | author name string | Jillian Crosson | |
Anne Beiter | |||
Barbara Buck | |||
Christine Menapace | |||
Linsey W Sunderhaus | |||
Lori O'Neill | |||
Phil Segel | |||
Timothy J Davis | |||
P2860 | cites work | Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition | Q28744616 |
Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. | Q30350466 | ||
Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation | Q30363820 | ||
The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants. | Q30375171 | ||
Optimizing the combination of acoustic and electric hearing in the implanted ear. | Q30383032 | ||
Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation | Q30383121 | ||
Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity. | Q30386875 | ||
Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant | Q30387035 | ||
Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception. | Q30392283 | ||
Impact of hair cell preservation in cochlear implantation: combined electric and acoustic hearing. | Q30393119 | ||
United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system | Q30393670 | ||
Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. | Q30410223 | ||
The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth | Q30418720 | ||
Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear. | Q30421577 | ||
Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus 6 cochlear implant system: performance improvements with SmartSound iQ. | Q30423353 | ||
Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant | Q30426998 | ||
Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments | Q30435627 | ||
Localization and speech understanding by a patient with bilateral cochlear implants and bilateral hearing preservation | Q30438333 | ||
Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit | Q30442263 | ||
HEARING, PSYCHOPHYSICS, AND COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION: EXPERIENCES OF OLDER INDIVIDUALS WITH MILD SLOPING TO PROFOUND SENSORY HEARING LOSS. | Q30446300 | ||
Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation | Q30453439 | ||
Current research with cochlear implants at Arizona State University | Q30454678 | ||
The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception | Q30459525 | ||
Bilateral cochlear implants in infants: a new approach--Nucleus Hybrid S12 project. | Q30474011 | ||
Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant | Q30477836 | ||
Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results | Q30478000 | ||
Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing | Q30482931 | ||
Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array | Q30486297 | ||
The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss | Q30487166 | ||
A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing | Q30489605 | ||
Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants | Q30492503 | ||
Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing | Q30494098 | ||
Restaurant noise, hearing loss, and hearing aids. | Q30498552 | ||
Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant | Q30570766 | ||
The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) | Q33199944 | ||
Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns | Q34186597 | ||
Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise | Q34337580 | ||
Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding | Q35041258 | ||
Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists | Q36277125 | ||
Hearing loss and the limits of amplification | Q36633901 | ||
Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users | Q37973974 | ||
The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding | Q38429130 | ||
Spectral redundancy: intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits | Q38571683 | ||
Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble | Q40219058 | ||
Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss | Q43452678 | ||
Impact of low-frequency hearing | Q44279641 | ||
Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. | Q44523089 | ||
Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise | Q44972329 | ||
Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. | Q46303826 | ||
Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users | Q47623428 | ||
A meta-analytic comparison of binaural benefits between bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. | Q47830374 | ||
The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients | Q48018614 | ||
Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation | Q48145279 | ||
European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. | Q48178427 | ||
Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit. | Q48433210 | ||
Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results. | Q50352234 | ||
Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor | Q50352452 | ||
Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays | Q50353282 | ||
Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422. | Q50353959 | ||
Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation | Q50355162 | ||
Hearing preservation after cochlear reimplantation | Q50357979 | ||
Assessment of intracochlear trauma caused by the insertion of a new straight research array | Q50431510 | ||
Cochlear function following implantation with a full electrode array | Q50433364 | ||
Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array | Q50435215 | ||
Clinical evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio-based noise reduction in Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients | Q50435423 | ||
Hearing preservation in partial deafness treatment | Q50436050 | ||
Electric acoustic stimulation in patients with postlingual severe high-frequency hearing loss: clinical experience | Q50440888 | ||
Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation | Q50448373 | ||
Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant | Q50463009 | ||
Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech | Q50465304 | ||
Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant | Q50470205 | ||
Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. | Q50471433 | ||
New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. | Q50475959 | ||
Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. | Q50481202 | ||
Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. | Q50490567 | ||
The effects of compression ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and level on speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners. | Q50491214 | ||
A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. | Q50494504 | ||
Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification. | Q50496859 | ||
Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. | Q50499663 | ||
Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. | Q50501488 | ||
High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. | Q50504804 | ||
Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. | Q50506632 | ||
The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. | Q50520919 | ||
Shifts in phonetic identification with changes in signal presentation level | Q50601185 | ||
Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. | Q51537945 | ||
Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover. | Q51833229 | ||
Contralateral masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear | Q73954181 | ||
Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant | Q84776723 | ||
P433 | issue | 5 | |
P921 | main subject | cochlear implant | Q724965 |
P1104 | number of pages | 15 | |
P304 | page(s) | 539-553 | |
P577 | publication date | 2017-03-15 | |
P1433 | published in | Ear and Hearing | Q13575058 |
P1476 | title | Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty | |
P478 | volume | 38 |
Q90392527 | Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation |
Q91696158 | Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation |
Q58085443 | Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation |
Q98164448 | Electro-haptic stimulation enhances speech recognition in spatially separated noise for cochlear implant users |
Q92045544 | Enhancement of Consonant Recognition in Bimodal and Normal Hearing Listeners |
Q91988885 | Hearing Preservation With the Use of Flex20 and Flex24 Electrodes in Patients With Partial Deafness |
Q42172103 | Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears |
Q90586339 | Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users |
Q33734664 | Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation |
Q50057314 | Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss. |
Q58584036 | Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing |
Q50096495 | Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants |
Q58735962 | Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening |
Search more.