| review article | Q7318358 |
| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Martin McKee | Q17146579 |
| P2093 | author name string | Britton A | |
| McPherson K | |||
| Black N | |||
| Sanderson C | |||
| Bain C | |||
| P433 | issue | 13 | |
| P921 | main subject | systematic review | Q1504425 |
| P304 | page(s) | i-iv, 1-124 | |
| P577 | publication date | 1998-01-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Health Technology Assessment | Q15708880 |
| P1476 | title | Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review. | |
| P478 | volume | 2 |
| Q37301484 | A new simple six-step model to promote recruitment to RCTs was developed and successfully implemented. |
| Q35841406 | A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder |
| Q25256641 | An analysis of sickness absence in chronically ill patients receiving complementary and alternative medicine: a longterm prospective intermittent study |
| Q61453294 | Anesthesia for endovascular treatment in anterior circulation stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q24814823 | Assessing observational studies of medical treatments |
| Q36381197 | Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis |
| Q33843231 | Body characteristics, [corrected] dietary protein and body weight regulation. Reconciling conflicting results from intervention and observational studies? |
| Q42766301 | Building evidence on chronic disease in old age. Standardised assessments and databases offer one way of building the evidence |
| Q36969788 | Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy |
| Q33793659 | Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation |
| Q42559085 | Comment on "Limitations of observational evidence: implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations". |
| Q28535464 | Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs: methodological overview |
| Q33346969 | Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy |
| Q42922363 | Editorial: Observational studies in ADHD: the effects of switching to modified-release methylphenidate preparations on clinical outcomes and adherence |
| Q91797565 | Heckman-type selection models to obtain unbiased estimates with missing measures outcome: theoretical considerations and an application to missing birth weight data |
| Q21203736 | Impact on mortality and cancer incidence rates of using random invitation from population registers for recruitment to trials |
| Q35225188 | Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include |
| Q33993388 | Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review |
| Q36981420 | It's time to choose the study design!: net benefit analysis of alternative study designs to acquire information for evaluation of health technologies |
| Q34748974 | Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011) |
| Q47883929 | Managing chronic disease: evidence-based medicine or patient centred medicine? |
| Q33894784 | Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview |
| Q33699720 | Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies |
| Q42368699 | Not-so-surprising findings |
| Q35162330 | Paediatric medicines research in the UK: how to move forward? |
| Q41273135 | Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YoDDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study Across 6 Predialysis Services |
| Q37704069 | Progress in evidence based reproductive surgery |
| Q34312788 | Radical radiotherapy for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer in patients not sufficiently fit for or declining surgery (medically inoperable): a systematic review |
| Q94335488 | Radical radiotherapy for stage I/II non‐small cell lung cancer in patients not sufficiently fit for or declining surgery (medically inoperable) |
| Q24235283 | Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials |
| Q34058899 | Recent clinical trials of acupuncture in the west: Responses from the practitioners |
| Q34501062 | Taking STOX: developing a cross disciplinary methodology for systematic reviews of research on the built environment and the health of the public. |
| Q24654647 | Template for developing guidelines for the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of psychophysiological interventions |
| Q42532135 | The body of evidence for advanced technology in radiation oncology |
| Q33860388 | The effectiveness of reproductive surgery in the treatment of female infertility: facts, views and vision |
| Q42768528 | The risk of bias from omitted research |
| Q37402842 | Use of primary care electronic medical record database in drug efficacy research on cardiovascular outcomes: comparison of database and randomised controlled trial findings |
| Q37459030 | Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions--a systematic review |
| Q42767628 | Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study |
Search more.