| P2093 | author name string | Keiko Sato | |
| | Mika Suzuki | |
| P2860 | cites work | How good does the science have to be in proposals submitted to Institutional Review Boards? An interview study of Institutional Review Board personnel | Q30571254 |
| | What makes clinical research ethical? | Q33924008 |
| | The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute: reflections on an ongoing experiment | Q38207709 |
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P921 | main subject | research ethics | Q1132684 |
| | ethical review process | Q56516143 |
| | ethical analysis | Q98139384 |
| | ethics review process | Q107087694 |
| P304 | page(s) | 256-266 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2016-07-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics | Q6295148 |
| P1476 | title | Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan: Proposed Measures for Improvement | |
| P478 | volume | 11 | |