Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study

scientific article

Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.7863/ULTRA.16.04059
P698PubMed publication ID28240842

P2093author name stringMaria Costa
Alexandre Helbert
Jean-Marc Hyvelin
Peter Frinking
Thierry Bettinger
Emmanuel Gaud
Philippe Bussat
P2860cites workGuidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUSQ28278903
Focal splenic lesions: US findingsQ30446640
Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principlesQ30538520
Contrast echocardiography: current and future applicationsQ33886229
The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications.Q34211494
MRI of colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparison of orally administered manganese with intravenously administered gadobenate dimeglumineQ35718531
Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US.Q35837910
Artifacts and pitfalls in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver.Q38183273
Detection and characterization of endoleaks following endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using contrast harmonic imaging (CHI) with quantitative perfusion analysis (TIC) compared to CT angiography (CTA).Q39909292
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonographyQ40276910
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib: early evaluation of treatment response using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonographyQ43166821
Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.Q43528059
Defining a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair surveillanceQ43938533
The safety of deFinity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast dosesQ44767178
Effect of Optison on pulmonary artery systolic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistanceQ45038540
Early prediction of response to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasoundQ45719507
Safety of contrast in stress echocardiography in stable patients and in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative 12-hour troponin.Q45940746
Small nodules (1-2 cm) in liver cirrhosis: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasoundQ46332508
Non-invasive prediction of the degree of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C using an ultrasound contrast agent. A pilot studyQ47810197
Quantitative evaluation of local myocardial blood volume in contrast echocardiography.Q51872285
Dynamic microbubble contrast-enhanced US to measure tumor response to targeted therapy: a proposed clinical protocol with results from renal cell carcinoma patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy.Q52610843
Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Q52985974
Improved prediction of outcome by contrast echocardiography determined left ventricular remodelling parameters compared to unenhanced echocardiography in patients following acute myocardial infarction.Q53059309
Diagnosis of focal liver masses on ultrasonography: comparison of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced scans.Q53479748
Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization.Q53529360
Enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced US: comparison with histologic differentiationQ56785949
The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigationsQ56997483
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs multidetector-computed tomography for detecting liver metastases in colorectal cancer: a prospective, blinded, patient-by-patient analysisQ57778635
P433issue5
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcontrast agentQ6849688
P304page(s)941-953
P577publication date2017-02-27
P1433published inJournal of Ultrasound in MedicineQ2111248
P1476titleCharacteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study
P478volume36

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92593367Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters
Q90067707Assessment of uteroplacental vascularisation in early first-trimester pregnancy with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and 3D power Doppler angiography: protocol for a prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre and non-randomised open study ("HOPE Study")
Q90312006Microbubble Agents: New Directions
Q100426163Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig
Q59516605Nanoparticle-assisted ultrasound: A special focus on sonodynamic therapy against cancer
Q44873581Optimizing Sensitivity of Ultrasound Contrast-Enhanced Super-Resolution Imaging by Tailoring Size Distribution of Microbubble Contrast Agent
Q89910045Recent strategies on targeted delivery of thrombolytics
Q58564835Reverse engineering the ultrasound contrast agent
Q98291572Role of shear wave elastography in the evaluation of the treatment and prognosis of supraspinatus tendinitis
Q91662538Sonographic real-time imaging of tissue perfusion in a porcine haemorrhagic shock model
Q58796703State-of-the-art of microbubble-assisted blood-brain barrier disruption
Q92666746Three Decades of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Review of the Past, Present and Future Improvements

Search more.