Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review

scientific article published on 19 September 2016

Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1111/CGE.12868
P698PubMed publication ID27643459

P50authorMandy L BallingerQ52900795
David M ThomasQ64605553
Amanda WillisQ85264878
P2093author name stringB Meiser
S K Smith
M-A Young
P2860cites workComprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumoursQ24630844
Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencingQ24632270
Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling servicesQ30308462
Men and health help-seeking behaviour: literature review.Q33212365
Withdrawal from genetic counselling for cancerQ33721583
Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndromeQ34017044
Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortalityQ34135443
African American women's limited knowledge and experiences with genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancerQ34630227
What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic reviewQ34682125
Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS).Q34980887
Factors influencing cancer risk perception in high risk populations: a systematic review.Q35056613
Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic reviewQ35690900
Genetic risk assessment for women with epithelial ovarian cancer: referral patterns and outcomes in a university gynecologic oncology clinicQ36108520
BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study GroupQ36145443
Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counseling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivorsQ36361079
Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participantsQ36470928
Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic reviewQ36479647
Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: black and Hispanic women particularly at riskQ36706640
Most patients with colorectal tumors at young age do not visit a cancer genetics clinicQ36800267
The withdrawal from oncogenetic counselling and testing for hereditary and familial breast and ovarian cancer. A descriptive study of an Italian sampleQ37040188
Low rates of African American participation in genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1/2 mutations: racial disparities or just a difference?Q37172955
Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-UpQ37234775
Awareness of genetic counseling and perceptions of its purpose: a survey of the Canadian publicQ37302605
A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy.Q37416415
Reflex testing for Lynch syndrome: if we build it, will they come? Lessons learned from the uptake of clinical genetics services by individuals with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC).Q37589534
What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative researchQ37727863
100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?Q38106642
Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literatureQ38203489
Barriers to participating in genetic counseling and BRCA testing during primary treatment for breast cancerQ40153778
Referral to cancer genetic counseling: are there stages of readiness?Q40275273
Proband family uptake of familial-genetic counselling.Q40727080
Recall of and reactions to a surgeon referral letter for BRCA genetic counseling among high-risk breast cancer patientsQ42619409
Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.Q43569660
Genetic testing for melanoma risk: a prospective cohort study of uptake and outcomes among Australian familiesQ46735021
Inequality of use of cancer genetics services by members of breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer families in South East ScotlandQ46774592
Genetic testing in familial melanoma: uptake and implications.Q48332903
Are videoconferenced consultations as effective as face-to-face consultations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling?Q48821165
Determinants of genetic counseling uptake and its impact on breast cancer outcome: a population-based study.Q50722910
Psychosocial consequences of genetic counseling: a population-based follow-up study.Q50762334
Socioeconomic status and quality of life of women with family history of breast cancer attending an oncogenetic counseling clinic: a comparison with general population.Q50779450
Acceptance of and attitude toward genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a comparison of participants and nonparticipants in genetic counseling.Q51005039
Endometrial cancer patients and compliance with genetic counseling: room for improvement.Q51526342
Ten Years After Mutation Testing for Lynch Syndrome: Cancer Incidence and Outcome in Mutation-Positive and Mutation-Negative Family MembersQ57567514
“For All My Family's Sake, I Should Go and Find Out”: An Australian Report on Genetic Counseling and Testing Uptake in Individuals at High Risk of Breast and/or Ovarian CancerQ57910567
P433issue2
P921main subjectsociodemographyQ3487479
P304page(s)121-133
P577publication date2016-09-19
P1433published inClinical GeneticsQ5133760
P1476titleSociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review
P478volume92

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q91989395An Applied Framework in Support of Shared Decision Making about BRCA Genetic Testing
Q91989403Automatic Genetic Risk Assessment Calculation Using Breast Cancer Family History Data from the EHR compared to Self-Report
Q49551487Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews
Q88709734Creation and Implementation of an Environmental Scan to Assess Cancer Genetics Services at Three Oncology Care Settings
Q49892558Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk
Q52660922Gaps in Receipt of Clinically Indicated Genetic Counseling After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
Q92008556Genetic counseling, genetic testing, and risk perceptions for breast and colorectal cancer: Results from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey
Q93387813Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors
Q92303085Is immunohistochemistry-based screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer effective? The consent's the thing
Q47350873Motivation, Perception, and Treatment Beliefs in the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) Randomized Clinical Trial
Q64279958Painting a portrait: Analysis of national health survey data for cancer genetic counseling
Q58786293Study protocol: a cluster randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for increasing BRCA1/2 genetic counseling referral in primary care

Search more.