Changing to NIPT as a first-tier screening test and future perspectives: opinions of health professionals

scientific article published on 28 September 2015

Changing to NIPT as a first-tier screening test and future perspectives: opinions of health professionals is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/PD.4697
P698PubMed publication ID26411372

P50authorLidewij HennemanQ46004972
Martina C. CornelQ59206152
P2093author name stringEva Pajkrt
Wybo J Dondorp
Merel van Maarle
Saskia Tamminga
Caterina M Bilardo
Rachèl V van Schendel
Wieke Rommers
P2860cites workNon-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challengesQ26999426
Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trialQ30651815
The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women in the NetherlandsQ33441979
Increased nuchal translucency in euploid fetuses--what should we be telling the parents?Q34020874
Prenatal screening for congenital anomalies: exploring midwives' perceptions of counseling clients with religious backgroundsQ34468736
Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysisQ35552815
Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus.Q36048523
The scope of prenatal diagnosis for women at increased risk for aneuploidies: views and preferences of professionals and potential usersQ36511337
Current status in non-invasive prenatal detection of Down syndrome, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13 using cell-free DNA in maternal plasmaQ38087410
ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy.Q38096182
Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near futureQ39072580
Obstetricians and gynecologists' practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testingQ39316545
Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis.Q41235376
Non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free DNA: US physician attitudes toward implementation in clinical practiceQ43469221
Trends in the utilization of invasive prenatal diagnosis in The Netherlands during 2000-2009.Q46013175
Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomyQ46784231
First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndromeQ46799629
Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for aneuploidy: toward an integral ethical assessment.Q48612533
NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?Q50596773
Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: NIPT for chromosome abnormalities should be offered to women with low a priori risk.Q51265143
The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues.Q53247850
Women's and healthcare professionals' preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment.Q53621688
Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionalsQ56780865
Maternal Plasma DNA Sequencing Reveals the Genome-Wide Genetic and Mutational Profile of the FetusQ56937251
Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serumQ57075132
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screeningQ57839565
Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive testsQ57839583
P433issue13
P304page(s)1316-1323
P577publication date2015-09-28
P1433published inPrenatal DiagnosisQ15760059
P1476titleChanging to NIPT as a first-tier screening test and future perspectives: opinions of health professionals
P478volume35

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q48280857Amniocentesis is still the best option for advanced genomic testing in case of fetal malformations
Q42278993Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing into publicly funded antenatal screening services for Down syndrome and other conditions in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Q57809529Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals
Q38838610Non-invasive prenatal screening versus prenatal diagnosis by array comparative genomic hybridization: a comparative retrospective study.
Q50093623Origin and clinical relevance of chromosomal aberrations other than the common trisomies detected by genome-wide NIPS: results of the TRIDENT study
Q39487915Survey of attitudes of Chinese perinatologists and obstetricians toward non-invasive prenatal genetic testing
Q87298407The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice
Q37557986Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives
Q48169164Views of the obstetric profession on non-invasive prenatal testing in Aotearoa New Zealand: A national survey
Q33634130What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?
Q47130129Women's Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results.

Search more.