Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible

scientific article published on 17 June 2016

Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1007795947
P356DOI10.1186/S40729-016-0050-6
P932PMC publication ID5005791
P698PubMed publication ID27747709

P2093author name stringYuji Sato
Noboru Kitagawa
Miyuki Omori
Yuta Shimura
P2860cites workWolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for cliniciansQ34332145
Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeysQ34413955
The effect of offset implant configuration on bone stress distribution: a systematic reviewQ38249127
A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis modelQ40980523
Microstrain around dental implants supporting fixed partial prostheses under axial and non-axial loading conditions, in vitro strain gauge analysis.Q42627593
The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental studyQ43612640
Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis.Q47173528
Straight and offset implant placement under axial and nonaxial loads in implant-supported prostheses: strain gauge analysisQ47244139
Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.Q47396903
The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.Q50928583
Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone: in-line versus offset placements of implants.Q51180900
Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations.Q51708852
Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.Q53644544
Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.Q64904979
Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and future success in the Brånemark® systemQ67474290
Forces and moments on Branemark implantsQ69576884
A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous regionQ73348452
Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo studyQ73445027
Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segmentQ73445036
Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implantsQ74828474
External hexagon and internal hexagon in straight and offset implant placement: strain gauge analysisQ82240092
Verification of the influence of the arrangement of implants on the load distribution (a well-known figure by Rangert)Q82782150
Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon, Morse taper, and influence of straight and offset implant configurationQ83744116
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectbiomechanicsQ193378
P304page(s)17
P577publication date2016-06-17
P1433published inInternational journal of implant dentistryQ27727414
P1476titleBiomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible
P478volume2