scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1085717714 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1038/546009A |
P2888 | exact match | https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1038/546009a |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 28569830 |
P50 | author | Benjamin List | Q105572 |
P433 | issue | 7656 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | peer review | Q215028 |
P304 | page(s) | 9 | |
P577 | publication date | 2017-05-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Nature | Q180445 |
P1476 | title | Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast | |
P478 | volume | 546 |
Q33269085 | A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review |
Q106988006 | A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review |
Q61054782 | Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality |
Q101154436 | Discussion: Analysis of Alternative Metrics of Research Impact: A Correlation Comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and Traditional Bibliometrics among Plastic Surgery Research |
Q47159249 | Internet Dilettantes' Crowd-Based Peer Review: An Exercise in Mediocrity |
Q91510497 | Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science |
Q90720018 | The Illusion and Disillusion of Peer Review |
Search more.