Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast

scientific article published on May 2017

Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1085717714
P356DOI10.1038/546009A
P2888exact matchhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1038/546009a
P698PubMed publication ID28569830

P50authorBenjamin ListQ105572
P433issue7656
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectpeer reviewQ215028
P304page(s)9
P577publication date2017-05-01
P1433published inNatureQ180445
P1476titleCrowd-based peer review can be good and fast
P478volume546

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q33269085A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Q106988006A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Q61054782Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality
Q101154436Discussion: Analysis of Alternative Metrics of Research Impact: A Correlation Comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and Traditional Bibliometrics among Plastic Surgery Research
Q47159249Internet Dilettantes' Crowd-Based Peer Review: An Exercise in Mediocrity
Q91510497Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science
Q90720018The Illusion and Disillusion of Peer Review

Search more.