scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Andrew J. Parker | Q37376049 |
P2093 | author name string | Lili Tcheang | |
Andrew Glennerster | |||
Andrew W Fitzgibbon | |||
Stuart J Gilson | |||
P2860 | cites work | Integration of depth modules: stereopsis and texture | Q72880491 |
The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information | Q73221818 | ||
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion | Q29614805 | ||
Systematic distortions of perceptual stability investigated using immersive virtual reality | Q39444923 | ||
A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications | Q41237874 | ||
Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination | Q45237793 | ||
Perceived distance, shape and size | Q47264537 | ||
The Effect of Attitude upon the Perception of Size | Q47441146 | ||
What determines visual cue reliability? | Q48533535 | ||
Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. | Q50804059 | ||
Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction. | Q52078651 | ||
Adaptation to telestereoscopic viewing measured by one-handed ball-catching performance. | Q52253409 | ||
Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. | Q52462392 | ||
Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon | Q59090559 | ||
The imprecision of stereopsis | Q68678777 | ||
P433 | issue | 4 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P1104 | number of pages | 5 | |
P304 | page(s) | 428-432 | |
P577 | publication date | 2006-02-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Current Biology | Q1144851 |
P1476 | title | Humans ignore motion and stereo cues in favor of a fictional stable world | |
P478 | volume | 16 |
Q42562499 | A demonstration of 'broken' visual space |
Q51905207 | A new binocular cue for absolute distance: Disparity relative to the most distant structure. |
Q50935301 | Adaptive changes in cortical receptive fields induced by attention to complex sounds. |
Q30459730 | An Embodied Approach to Perception: By What Units Are Visual Perceptions Scaled? |
Q42838914 | An automated calibration method for non-see-through head mounted displays |
Q39541270 | Cue combination for 3D location judgements |
Q34533925 | Discerning nonrigid 3D shapes from motion cues |
Q30484993 | Early stages of melody processing: stimulus-sequence and task-dependent neuronal activity in monkey auditory cortical fields A1 and R. |
Q35175156 | How moving backgrounds influence interception. |
Q24658009 | Neural codes for perceptual discrimination of acoustic flutter in the primate auditory cortex |
Q34256659 | People favour imperfect catching by assuming a stable world |
Q50638994 | Perceived rigidity in motion-in-depth increases with contour perspective. |
Q45926185 | Reverse correlation reveals how observers sample visual information when estimating three-dimensional shape. |
Q41833357 | Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head-mounted display |
Q36376075 | Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System |
Q53446198 | Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making. |
Q38445276 | Surface lightness influences perceived room height |
Q35620782 | The importance of postural cues for determining eye height in immersive virtual reality |
Q47122303 | Use of cues in virtual reality depends on visual feedback |
Q30497968 | Visual influence on path integration in darkness indicates a multimodal representation of large-scale space |
Q41583650 | Visual stability-what is the problem? |
Q62492460 | What is a cognitive map? Unravelling its mystery using robots |
Search more.