| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00154-5 |
| P8608 | Fatcat ID | release_wuv5ewktxff5dcirz3v4hqft5e |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 12614703 |
| P50 | author | Penelope Hawe | Q92255076 |
| Alan M. Shiell | Q45353839 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Megan Fletcher | |
| P2860 | cites work | Design and validation of a bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning allogenic bone marrow transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia | Q72157270 |
| Complete preferences over health states: a reply to the paper by Shiell et al | Q73344392 | ||
| Are preferences over health states complete? | Q73493006 | ||
| Preference measurement using conjoint methods: an empirical investigation of reliability | Q74026595 | ||
| Judgment and decision making | Q74297162 | ||
| Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age | Q85527916 | ||
| EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life | Q29547873 | ||
| Effect of discussion and deliberation on public's views of priority setting. More data are needed for readers to make judgment about study | Q30579298 | ||
| Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal | Q33628526 | ||
| Preferences for health outcomes. Comparison of assessment methods | Q34256051 | ||
| Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. | Q34294306 | ||
| The effects of an 'explicit' values clarification exercise in a woman's decision aid regarding postmenopausal hormone therapy | Q37334290 | ||
| Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study | Q37431420 | ||
| Cost utility analysis: what should be measured? | Q40692578 | ||
| Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument | Q40929530 | ||
| Sample size requirements for reliability studies | Q44472329 | ||
| Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer | Q48578151 | ||
| Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. | Q53655098 | ||
| A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer | Q57194662 | ||
| Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective | Q57614113 | ||
| Preferences for public health insurance: egotism or altruism? | Q58388700 | ||
| The construction of preference | Q59486997 | ||
| The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods | Q59848136 | ||
| P433 | issue | 7 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P304 | page(s) | 1531-1541 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2003-04-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Social Science and Medicine | Q7550785 |
| P1476 | title | Reliability of health utility measures and a test of values clarification | |
| P478 | volume | 56 |
| Q35993687 | 'Threats' to and hopes for estimating benefits |
| Q52969693 | A comparison of 3 valuation methods for temporary health states in patients treated with oral anticoagulants. |
| Q34033150 | Development and preliminary user testing of the DCIDA (Dynamic computer interactive decision application) for 'nudging' patients towards high quality decisions |
| Q81063713 | [How should patients' utilities be incorporated into clinical decisions? 2008 SESPAS Report] |
Search more.