Decision-making for non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: Hong Kong Chinese women's preferences for individual vs relational autonomy

scientific article

Decision-making for non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: Hong Kong Chinese women's preferences for individual vs relational autonomy is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1111/CGE.12743
P953full work available at URLhttp://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/96023/
P698PubMed publication ID26864268
P1154Scopus EID2-s2.0-84959471227

P50authorHuso YiQ41611065
P2093author name stringS Ahmed
J Y C Lau
P2860cites workUpdate on Procedure-Related Risks for Prenatal Diagnosis TechniquesQ22241937
Using thematic analysis in psychologyQ30476519
Maternal decisions regarding prenatal diagnosis: rational choices or sensible decisions?Q33961381
Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocolQ34480344
Motivations for undertaking DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: a qualitative study with early adopter patients in Hong KongQ35060714
Knowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire surveyQ35761823
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screeningQ36184534
Experiences of parents with a child with Down syndrome in Pakistan and their views on termination of pregnancyQ36511342
Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethicsQ37044362
Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-makingQ37082828
'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web ResourceQ37332154
Is advice incompatible with autonomous informed choice? Women's perceptions of advice in the context of antenatal screening: a qualitative studyQ37333135
Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice?Q37333449
Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].Q37711798
The Family and Harmonious Medical Decision Making: Cherishing an Appropriate Confucian Moral BalanceQ37790522
Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeksQ37826399
The clinical implementation of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders: challenges and progress madeQ38099617
Benefits and limitations of whole genome versus targeted approaches for noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidiesQ38101277
Towards a relational model of decision-making in midwifery careQ38495640
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: a systematic review of Internet advertising to potential users by commercial companies and private health providersQ38565317
Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challengesQ39072609
Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choiceQ41224115
Women's views and the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on procedures in a managed care settingQ46106095
Interpretations of informed choice in antenatal screening: a cross-cultural, Q-methodology studyQ47226490
The family-facilitated approach could be dangerous if there is pressure by family dynamicsQ47227934
Informed consent Hong Kong style: an instance of moderate familismQ47319843
Relational autonomy and multiculturalismQ47367690
Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake.Q51461502
'Just a bystander'? Men's place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis.Q51840561
Midwives' perceptions of their role as facilitators of informed choice in antenatal screening.Q52842728
Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serumQ57075132
Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive testsQ57839583
Ethical Concerns in the Implementation of DNA Sequencing-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy Among Obstetric Professionals in Hong KongQ58106704
P433issue5
P921main subjectDown syndromeQ47715
decision makingQ1331926
P304page(s)550-556
P577publication date2016-02-10
P1433published inClinical GeneticsQ5133760
P1476titleDecision-making for non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: Hong Kong Chinese women's preferences for individual vs relational autonomy
P478volume89

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q56556972"Ultimately, mom has the call": Viewing clinical trial decision making among patients with ovarian cancer through the lens of relational autonomy
Q61448634Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences
Q48130272Interpretations of autonomous decision-making in antenatal genetic screening among women in China, Hong Kong and Pakistan
Q41611034Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.
Q64236032Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis
Q58706796Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
Q38661271Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-invasive prenatal DNA testing for trisomy 21: implications for implementation in China

Search more.