scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1111/CGE.12743 |
P953 | full work available at URL | http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/96023/ |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 26864268 |
P1154 | Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-84959471227 |
P50 | author | Huso Yi | Q41611065 |
P2093 | author name string | S Ahmed | |
J Y C Lau | |||
P2860 | cites work | Update on Procedure-Related Risks for Prenatal Diagnosis Techniques | Q22241937 |
Using thematic analysis in psychology | Q30476519 | ||
Maternal decisions regarding prenatal diagnosis: rational choices or sensible decisions? | Q33961381 | ||
Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol | Q34480344 | ||
Motivations for undertaking DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: a qualitative study with early adopter patients in Hong Kong | Q35060714 | ||
Knowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire survey | Q35761823 | ||
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening | Q36184534 | ||
Experiences of parents with a child with Down syndrome in Pakistan and their views on termination of pregnancy | Q36511342 | ||
Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics | Q37044362 | ||
Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making | Q37082828 | ||
'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource | Q37332154 | ||
Is advice incompatible with autonomous informed choice? Women's perceptions of advice in the context of antenatal screening: a qualitative study | Q37333135 | ||
Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice? | Q37333449 | ||
Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected]. | Q37711798 | ||
The Family and Harmonious Medical Decision Making: Cherishing an Appropriate Confucian Moral Balance | Q37790522 | ||
Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks | Q37826399 | ||
The clinical implementation of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders: challenges and progress made | Q38099617 | ||
Benefits and limitations of whole genome versus targeted approaches for noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies | Q38101277 | ||
Towards a relational model of decision-making in midwifery care | Q38495640 | ||
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: a systematic review of Internet advertising to potential users by commercial companies and private health providers | Q38565317 | ||
Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges | Q39072609 | ||
Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice | Q41224115 | ||
Women's views and the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on procedures in a managed care setting | Q46106095 | ||
Interpretations of informed choice in antenatal screening: a cross-cultural, Q-methodology study | Q47226490 | ||
The family-facilitated approach could be dangerous if there is pressure by family dynamics | Q47227934 | ||
Informed consent Hong Kong style: an instance of moderate familism | Q47319843 | ||
Relational autonomy and multiculturalism | Q47367690 | ||
Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users' views and likely uptake. | Q51461502 | ||
'Just a bystander'? Men's place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis. | Q51840561 | ||
Midwives' perceptions of their role as facilitators of informed choice in antenatal screening. | Q52842728 | ||
Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum | Q57075132 | ||
Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests | Q57839583 | ||
Ethical Concerns in the Implementation of DNA Sequencing-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy Among Obstetric Professionals in Hong Kong | Q58106704 | ||
P433 | issue | 5 | |
P921 | main subject | Down syndrome | Q47715 |
decision making | Q1331926 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 550-556 | |
P577 | publication date | 2016-02-10 | |
P1433 | published in | Clinical Genetics | Q5133760 |
P1476 | title | Decision-making for non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: Hong Kong Chinese women's preferences for individual vs relational autonomy | |
P478 | volume | 89 |
Q56556972 | "Ultimately, mom has the call": Viewing clinical trial decision making among patients with ovarian cancer through the lens of relational autonomy |
Q61448634 | Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences |
Q48130272 | Interpretations of autonomous decision-making in antenatal genetic screening among women in China, Hong Kong and Pakistan |
Q41611034 | Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications. |
Q64236032 | Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis |
Q58706796 | Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers |
Q38661271 | Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-invasive prenatal DNA testing for trisomy 21: implications for implementation in China |
Search more.