scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1002/SIM.1120 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 12185890 |
P2093 | author name string | Alex D McMahon | |
P2860 | cites work | What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials | Q24647858 |
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care | Q24655465 | ||
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs | Q24670544 | ||
Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle | Q28144942 | ||
Induction versus Popper: substance versus semantics | Q28284197 | ||
Ideas and ideals in medicine: fruits of reason or props of power? | Q30322924 | ||
Falsificationism and clinical trials. | Q30365070 | ||
Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials | Q30588628 | ||
Intention-to-treat vs. on-treatment analyses of clinical trial data: experience from a study of pyrimethamine in the primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients. ANRS 005/ACTG 154 Trial Group. | Q32061559 | ||
Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients? | Q33540400 | ||
Applying evidence to the individual patient | Q33541094 | ||
The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studies | Q33575546 | ||
Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses--sometimes informative, usually misleading | Q33651245 | ||
Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies | Q33699720 | ||
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation in the real world. Effectiveness versus efficacy studies | Q33761452 | ||
Generalisation and extrapolation | Q33791406 | ||
Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in psychiatry | Q33822966 | ||
Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study | Q33956298 | ||
Design issues for drug epidemiology | Q34078588 | ||
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials | Q34220184 | ||
What are pragmatic trials? | Q34457119 | ||
Pragmatic and explanatory trials in the evaluation of the experimental National Health Service nursing homes | Q38638887 | ||
The clinical trial as a paradigm for epidemiologic research | Q38652659 | ||
A study in contrasts: eligibility criteria in a twenty-year sample of NSABP and POG clinical trials. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Program. Pediatric Oncology Group | Q39227159 | ||
Intention-to-treat analysis and the goals of clinical trials | Q40575057 | ||
Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials. | Q40590980 | ||
Selection bias in observational and experimental studies | Q40667326 | ||
Alternative perspectives on the biased foundations of medical technology assessment | Q40879344 | ||
The scope and nature of epidemiology | Q40938990 | ||
Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients? | Q40981987 | ||
Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials | Q41187186 | ||
The risk of bias from omitted research | Q42768528 | ||
Observation and experiment with the efficacy of drugs: a warning example from a cohort of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and ulcer-healing drug users | Q44406997 | ||
Ruminations on the intent-to-treat principle | Q45280646 | ||
Common sense and figures: the rhetoric of validity in medicine (Bradford Hill Memorial Lecture 1999). | Q48578599 | ||
A cohort study (with re-sampled comparator groups) to measure the association between new NSAID prescribing and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and perforation. | Q50959758 | ||
Choosing covariates in the analysis of clinical trials. | Q52424983 | ||
Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles | Q52861899 | ||
Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria. | Q52866580 | ||
Model inconsistency, illustrated by the cox proportional hazards model | Q52877925 | ||
Reporting the study populations of clinical trials. Clear transmission or static on the line? | Q53510768 | ||
Issues in Adjusting for Covariates Arising Postrandomization in Clinical Trials | Q56856114 | ||
P433 | issue | 10 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 1365-1376 | |
P577 | publication date | 2002-05-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Statistics in Medicine | Q7604438 |
P1476 | title | Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials | |
P478 | volume | 21 |
Q37285642 | A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse |
Q40263701 | Adherence to guidelines and breast cancer patients survival: a population-based cohort study analyzed with a causal inference approach. |
Q46083440 | An effectiveness evaluation of a multifaceted preventive intervention on occupational injuries in foundries: a 13-year follow-up study with interrupted time series analysis |
Q37014390 | An explanatory randomised placebo controlled trial of levothyroxine supplementation for babies born <28 weeks' gestation: results of the TIPIT trial |
Q37287976 | Attrition and related trends in scientific rigor: a score card for ART adherence intervention research and recommendations for future directions |
Q37063507 | Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research |
Q79776447 | Clinical trial results applied to management of the individual cancer patient |
Q35872616 | Comparison of the caries-protective effect of fluoride varnish with treatment as usual in nursery school attendees receiving preventive oral health support through the Childsmile oral health improvement programme - the Protecting Teeth@3 Study: a ra |
Q40985164 | Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? |
Q38383271 | Cost-effectiveness of post-diagnosis treatment in dementia coordinated by Multidisciplinary Memory Clinics in comparison to treatment coordinated by general practitioners: an example of a pragmatic trial. |
Q31021629 | Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials |
Q36822127 | Does evidence-based medicine apply to psychiatry? |
Q48367260 | Efficacy versus effectiveness study design within the European screening trial for prostate cancer: consequences for cancer incidence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality. |
Q41049457 | Estimating treatment effects in randomised controlled trials with non-compliance: a simulation study |
Q37685134 | Explanatory versus pragmatic trial-based economic evaluations: application to alternative therapies for burns |
Q59392830 | Percent total attrition: a poor metric for study rigor in hosted intervention designs |
Q37677324 | Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
Q42470900 | Probiotics for pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials |
Q24245196 | Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea |
Q81309195 | Short-term progressive resistance exercise may not be effective at increasing wrist strength in people with tetraplegia: a randomised controlled trial |
Q35017368 | Stepping down inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: randomised controlled trial |
Q34871813 | Systematic reviews of animal experiments |
Q57759169 | The Alberta hip and knee replacement project: A model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways |
Q33699610 | The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer |
Q57648852 | The addition of electrical stimulation to progressive resistance training does not enhance the wrist strength of people with tetraplegia: a randomized controlled trial |
Q51927623 | The effects of antipsychotic treatment on quality of life of schizophrenic patients under naturalistic treatment conditions: an application of random effect regression models and propensity scores in an observational prospective trial. |
Q34354806 | The use of the Revised Trauma Score as an entry criterion in traumatic hemorrhagic shock studies: data from the DCLHb clinical trials |
Q34086851 | Update on the third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke and baseline features of the 3035 patients recruited |
Q84745090 | [Pragmatic trials in a routine care setting] |
Search more.