Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials

scientific article published on May 2002

Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/SIM.1120
P698PubMed publication ID12185890

P2093author name stringAlex D McMahon
P2860cites workWhat is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trialsQ24647858
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health careQ24655465
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designsQ24670544
Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principleQ28144942
Induction versus Popper: substance versus semanticsQ28284197
Ideas and ideals in medicine: fruits of reason or props of power?Q30322924
Falsificationism and clinical trials.Q30365070
Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trialsQ30588628
Intention-to-treat vs. on-treatment analyses of clinical trial data: experience from a study of pyrimethamine in the primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients. ANRS 005/ACTG 154 Trial Group.Q32061559
Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients?Q33540400
Applying evidence to the individual patientQ33541094
The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studiesQ33575546
Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses--sometimes informative, usually misleadingQ33651245
Methods in health services research. Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studiesQ33699720
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation in the real world. Effectiveness versus efficacy studiesQ33761452
Generalisation and extrapolationQ33791406
Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in psychiatryQ33822966
Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case studyQ33956298
Design issues for drug epidemiologyQ34078588
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trialsQ34220184
What are pragmatic trials?Q34457119
Pragmatic and explanatory trials in the evaluation of the experimental National Health Service nursing homesQ38638887
The clinical trial as a paradigm for epidemiologic researchQ38652659
A study in contrasts: eligibility criteria in a twenty-year sample of NSABP and POG clinical trials. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Program. Pediatric Oncology GroupQ39227159
Intention-to-treat analysis and the goals of clinical trialsQ40575057
Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials.Q40590980
Selection bias in observational and experimental studiesQ40667326
Alternative perspectives on the biased foundations of medical technology assessmentQ40879344
The scope and nature of epidemiologyQ40938990
Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients?Q40981987
Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trialsQ41187186
The risk of bias from omitted researchQ42768528
Observation and experiment with the efficacy of drugs: a warning example from a cohort of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and ulcer-healing drug usersQ44406997
Ruminations on the intent-to-treat principleQ45280646
Common sense and figures: the rhetoric of validity in medicine (Bradford Hill Memorial Lecture 1999).Q48578599
A cohort study (with re-sampled comparator groups) to measure the association between new NSAID prescribing and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and perforation.Q50959758
Choosing covariates in the analysis of clinical trials.Q52424983
Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. PrinciplesQ52861899
Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria.Q52866580
Model inconsistency, illustrated by the cox proportional hazards modelQ52877925
Reporting the study populations of clinical trials. Clear transmission or static on the line?Q53510768
Issues in Adjusting for Covariates Arising Postrandomization in Clinical TrialsQ56856114
P433issue10
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)1365-1376
P577publication date2002-05-01
P1433published inStatistics in MedicineQ7604438
P1476titleStudy control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials
P478volume21

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37285642A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse
Q40263701Adherence to guidelines and breast cancer patients survival: a population-based cohort study analyzed with a causal inference approach.
Q46083440An effectiveness evaluation of a multifaceted preventive intervention on occupational injuries in foundries: a 13-year follow-up study with interrupted time series analysis
Q37014390An explanatory randomised placebo controlled trial of levothyroxine supplementation for babies born <28 weeks' gestation: results of the TIPIT trial
Q37287976Attrition and related trends in scientific rigor: a score card for ART adherence intervention research and recommendations for future directions
Q37063507Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research
Q79776447Clinical trial results applied to management of the individual cancer patient
Q35872616Comparison of the caries-protective effect of fluoride varnish with treatment as usual in nursery school attendees receiving preventive oral health support through the Childsmile oral health improvement programme - the Protecting Teeth@3 Study: a ra
Q40985164Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be?
Q38383271Cost-effectiveness of post-diagnosis treatment in dementia coordinated by Multidisciplinary Memory Clinics in comparison to treatment coordinated by general practitioners: an example of a pragmatic trial.
Q31021629Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials
Q36822127Does evidence-based medicine apply to psychiatry?
Q48367260Efficacy versus effectiveness study design within the European screening trial for prostate cancer: consequences for cancer incidence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality.
Q41049457Estimating treatment effects in randomised controlled trials with non-compliance: a simulation study
Q37685134Explanatory versus pragmatic trial-based economic evaluations: application to alternative therapies for burns
Q59392830Percent total attrition: a poor metric for study rigor in hosted intervention designs
Q37677324Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Q42470900Probiotics for pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials
Q24245196Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Q81309195Short-term progressive resistance exercise may not be effective at increasing wrist strength in people with tetraplegia: a randomised controlled trial
Q35017368Stepping down inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: randomised controlled trial
Q34871813Systematic reviews of animal experiments
Q57759169The Alberta hip and knee replacement project: A model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways
Q33699610The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
Q57648852The addition of electrical stimulation to progressive resistance training does not enhance the wrist strength of people with tetraplegia: a randomized controlled trial
Q51927623The effects of antipsychotic treatment on quality of life of schizophrenic patients under naturalistic treatment conditions: an application of random effect regression models and propensity scores in an observational prospective trial.
Q34354806The use of the Revised Trauma Score as an entry criterion in traumatic hemorrhagic shock studies: data from the DCLHb clinical trials
Q34086851Update on the third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke and baseline features of the 3035 patients recruited
Q84745090[Pragmatic trials in a routine care setting]

Search more.