Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.

scientific article published on September 2006

Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1098/RSBL.2006.0483
P932PMC publication ID1686200
P698PubMed publication ID17148400
P5875ResearchGate publication ID6651547

P50authorCandy RoweQ61202705
John SkelhornQ87361137
P2860cites workThe chemistry of sexual selectionQ24562705
Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chainQ24646054
Sequestration of defensive substances from plants by LepidopteraQ34103688
Differences and similarities in cardenolide contents of queen and monarch butterflies in florida and their ecological and evolutionary implications.Q51219576
Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?Q51978153
Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.Q51999102
Predator discrimination error and the benefits of Müllerian mimicryQ74668718
Defensive secretions of arthropodsQ81126816
Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solutionQ81190483
Economics of chemical defense in chrysomelinaeQ86893494
FORAGING DYNAMICS OF BIRD PREDATORS ON OVERWINTERING MONARCH BUTTERFLIES IN MEXICOQ88192061
SURVIVAL OF DISTASTEFUL INSECTS AFTER BEING ATTACKED BY NAIVE BIRDS: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE THEORY OF APOSEMATIC COLORATION EVOLVING THROUGH INDIVIDUAL SELECTIONQ88205972
P433issue3
P921main subjectpredator–prey systemQ2178572
predationQ170430
avian predatorQ122050794
P6104maintained by WikiProjectWikiProject EcologyQ10818384
P304page(s)348-350
P577publication date2006-09-01
P1433published inBiology LettersQ43341
P1476titleAvian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence
P478volume2

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q36701398"Parasite-induced aposematism" protects entomopathogenic nematode parasites against invertebrate enemies
Q38529248Are aposematic signals honest? A review
Q51724270Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.
Q36347924Body size but not warning signal luminance influences predation risk in recently metamorphosed poison frogs
Q34030761Chemical defense across three trophic levels: Catalpa bignonioides, the caterpillar Ceratomia catalpae, and its endoparasitoid Cotesia congregata
Q51542573Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey.
Q38427785Does avian conspicuous colouration increase or reduce predation risk?
Q41695959Does spatial variation in predation pressure modulate selection for aposematism?
Q57591781Evolution of the Avian Brain and Senses
Q28475584Explaining the evolution of warning coloration: secreted secondary defence chemicals may facilitate the evolution of visual aposematic signals
Q104471900Hemipteran defensive odors trigger predictable color biases in jumping spider predators
Q60629407Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey
Q91630198Methods for independently manipulating palatability and color in small insect prey
Q64989301Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider.
Q35053971Odorous and non-fatal skin secretion of adult wrinkled frog (Rana rugosa) is effective in avoiding predation by snakes
Q50436880Reactions of green lizards (Lacerta viridis) to major repellent compounds secreted by Graphosoma lineatum (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae).
Q46721912Reception of Aversive Taste
Q36237985The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.
Q46334714The ability of lizards to identify an artificial Batesian mimic
Q51706980The evolutionary stability of automimicry.
Q29398617Warning displays may function as honest signals of toxicity
Q38006035Why are defensive toxins so variable? An evolutionary perspective

Search more.