An alternative parameterization of Bayesian logistic hierarchical models for mixed treatment comparisons

scientific article published on 7 May 2015

An alternative parameterization of Bayesian logistic hierarchical models for mixed treatment comparisons is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/PST.1688
P8608Fatcat IDrelease_dsftbm7zvfbxddxtjm6kn5myyq
P698PubMed publication ID25958984

P50authorMaarten J. PostmaQ87840199
P2093author name stringPetros Pechlivanoglou
Ernst Wit
Fentaw Abegaz
P2860cites workIndirect comparisons of competing interventionsQ28183606
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsQ29619499
The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsQ29619501
Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysisQ34604680
Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysisQ36381197
Evaluation of networks of randomized trialsQ36966424
Evidence synthesis for decision making 6: embedding evidence synthesis in probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysisQ36991726
Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisonsQ37167644
Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessmentQ37259556
Are adverse effects incorporated in economic models? An initial review of current practiceQ37657795
Network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: reporting the proper summariesQ37678529
Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysisQ37705195
Prevention of first bleeding in cirrhosis. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of nonsurgical treatmentQ44194059
Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisonsQ45817322
Guidance on the implementation and reporting of a drug safety Bayesian network meta-analysisQ46450711
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.Q46894544
Methods for incorporating covariate adjustment, subgroup analysis and between-centre differences into cost-effectiveness evaluationsQ50130117
Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials.Q51929967
Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.Q52287071
Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study.Q52320769
P433issue4
P304page(s)322-331
P577publication date2015-05-07
P1433published inPharmaceutical StatisticsQ7180744
P1476titleAn alternative parameterization of Bayesian logistic hierarchical models for mixed treatment comparisons
P478volume14