Current Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty

scientific article published on July 2017

Current Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.4103/ORTHO.IJORTHO_144_17
P932PMC publication ID5525519
P698PubMed publication ID28790467

P2093author name stringAsim Rajpura
Tim Board
Deepu Bhaskar
P2860cites workCorrelation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacementQ28295628
Quantification of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplastyQ33592766
Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasiaQ33970349
The influence of the centre of rotation on implant survival using a modular stem hip prosthesis.Q33970961
Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysisQ33989653
Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis.Q34322050
Hip Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Measurement with NavigationQ34476898
The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospitalQ34477136
Acetabular anteversion with CT in supine, simulated standing, and sitting positions in a THA patient populationQ34622082
Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplastyQ34734490
Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt?Q35158835
Pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: when does it matter?Q35177456
Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular componentQ36136249
What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component PositionQ36452613
Study of hip joint dislocation after total hip arthroplastyQ36478803
Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplastyQ36495671
Microseparation, fluid pressure and flow in failures of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplastiesQ36765454
Impingement with total hip replacementQ36899804
Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offsetQ37380182
The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplastyQ37667123
Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysisQ37836145
Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: a review of literature.Q38125418
The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplastyQ38557290
The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time.Q39554917
The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplastyQ39792203
Should the acetabular cup be medialised in total hip arthroplastyQ39993658
The difference between the radiographic and the operative angle of inclination of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: use of a digital protractor and the circumference of the hip to improve orientationQ40276390
How does pelvic rotation or tilt affect radiographic measurement of acetabular component inclination angle during THA?Q41814336
Does standing affect acetabular component inclination and version after THA?Q41955479
Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement.Q43923708
Displacement of the hip center of rotation after arthroplasty of Crowe III and IV dysplasia: a radiological and biomechanical study.Q44223569
Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and preventionQ44633825
Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty.Q47327631
Effect of restoration of combined offset on stability of large head THA.Q47407340
The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigationQ47940806
Resolving inconsistencies in defining the target orientation for the acetabular cup angles in total hip arthroplastyQ48033655
Placement of the acetabular componentQ50244266
Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty.Q50927088
Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position.Q50937253
The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement.Q50938101
Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation.Q50982112
The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability.Q51173625
Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate.Q51346606
The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.Q51589796
Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.Q51665188
Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation.Q51790590
Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.Q51817114
Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty.Q52132627
Restoration of the centre of rotation in primary total hip arthroplasty: the influence of acetabular floor depth and reaming technique.Q52951031
Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement.Q53061045
The transverse acetabular ligament: optimizing version.Q53458467
Predictability of Acetabular Component Angular Change with Postural Shift from Standing to Sitting Position.Q53520475
The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearingsQ54506008
Reconstructed Hip Joint Position and Abductor Muscle Strength After Total Hip ArthroplastyQ59273565
Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplastiesQ67318342
Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precisionQ67580019
The definition and measurement of acetabular orientationQ70589585
Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignmentQ72755568
Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patternsQ73047457
Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplastyQ74194017
Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulationQ77331718
Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysisQ77894726
Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadaversQ78884890
Primary hip arthroplasty templating on standard radiographs. A stepwise approachQ82041327
A simple intraoperative technique to avoid limb length discrepancy in total hip arthroplastyQ83372884
The role of patient factors and implant position in squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacementsQ83780298
Do we medialise the hip centre of rotation in total hip arthroplasty? Influence of acetabular offset and surgical techniqueQ84734344
Photographic measurement of the inclination of the acetabular component in total hip replacement using the posterior approachQ84961315
Using a calliper to restore the centre of the femoral head during total hip replacementQ85312629
P433issue4
P304page(s)386-396
P577publication date2017-07-01
P1433published inIndian Journal of OrthopaedicsQ15817858
P1476titleCurrent Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty
P478volume51

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q59798442Impact of acetabular reaming depth on reconstruction of rotation center in primary total hip arthroplasty
Q42336560Total Hip Arthroplasty in 2017 - Current Concepts and Recent Advances.

Search more.