| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1080/17441692.2014.989533 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 25585047 |
| P50 | author | Alain Giami | Q2829850 |
| P2093 | author name string | Kenneth Rochel de Camargo | |
| André Luiz de Oliveira Mendonça | |||
| Christophe Perrey | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Why most published research findings are false | Q21092395 |
| Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research | Q29620013 | ||
| Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects | Q37671448 | ||
| Male circumcision and HIV: a controversy study on facts and values. | Q38128340 | ||
| Male circumcision for protection against HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: the evidence in favour justifies the implementation now in progress. | Q39571729 | ||
| What is the role of the precautionary principle in the philosophy of medicine and bioethics? | Q53321519 | ||
| Understanding AIDS: historical interpretations and the limits of biomedical individualism. | Q53676484 | ||
| P433 | issue | 5-6 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 667-671 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2015-01-13 | |
| P1433 | published in | Global Public Health | Q15762735 |
| P1476 | title | Making the circumcision controversy controversial: going meta and taking aim at the messenger(s): reply to Wamai et al | |
| P478 | volume | 10 |
| Q93181636 | Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review |
| Q41448170 | Debating male circumcision for HIV prevention: a one-sided argument does not represent a legitimate 'controversy' analysis--reply to de Camargo et al. |
| Q40379346 | Expertise or ideology? A response to Morris et al. 2016, 'Circumcision is a primary preventive against HIV infection: Critique of a contrary meta-regression analysis by Van Howe'. |
Search more.