The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

scientific article published on January 2008

The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1179/106698108790818332
P932PMC publication ID2716154
P698PubMed publication ID19771197
P5875ResearchGate publication ID26828561

P2093author name stringTak Fung
Stephen May
Audrey Long
P2860cites workPredictors of return to work in patients sick listed for sub-acute low back pain: a 12-month follow-up studyQ81480159
Centralization: its prognostic value in patients with referred symptoms and sciaticaQ81803106
Predictors and modifiers of treatment effect influencing sick leave in subacute low back pain patientsQ82054815
Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosisQ24673571
1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back painQ30403273
Prevalence of low back pain in the community: implications for service provision in Bradford, UK.Q30492369
Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective studyQ33623180
Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective studyQ33785185
A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back painQ33940840
Categorizing patients with occupational low back pain by use of the Quebec Task Force Classification system versus pain pattern classification procedures: discriminant and predictive validity.Q33976212
What predicts outcome in non-operative treatments of chronic low back pain? A systematic reviewQ36436816
How common is low back pain in the Nordic population? Data from a recent study on a middle-aged general Danish population and four surveys previously conducted in the Nordic countriesQ36821041
Centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred painQ37853779
Prognostic indicators for acute low-back painQ37865035
The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain: a preliminary investigation involving patients classified for specific exerciseQ40375182
Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patients' own criteriaQ40916527
The economic burden of back pain in the UK.Q43498681
Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population-based study in Belgian adultsQ45004570
Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United StatesQ47292438
Length of disability prognosis in acute occupational low back pain: development and testing of a practical approachQ48454070
A prospective follow-up study of low back pain in the community.Q50664030
A population-based study of spinal pain among 35-45-year-old individuals. Prevalence, sick leave, and health care use.Q50875667
Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands.Q50908190
Estimating the prevalence of low back pain in the general population. Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Survey.Q51042657
Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute "nonspecific" low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial.Q51815124
Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use.Q53351090
Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica.Q53638862
Prognostic Factors for Low Back Pain in Patients Referred for PhysiotherapyQ57829555
A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The NetherlandsQ57830433
A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back painQ60681542
Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors in Acute Low Back PainQ60759254
The centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness as a predictor or outcome in conservative treatment of chronic law back pain (a pilot study)Q71022739
The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction of return to work for patients with low back painQ73228746
Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disabilityQ73735025
Centralization of low back pain and perceived functional outcomeQ74349628
Do within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion predict between-session changes in patients with low back pain?Q76384773
A descriptive study of the centralization phenomenon. A prospective analysisQ77345188
Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patternsQ78836646
Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back painQ81059941
Classification of low back pain in primary care: using "bothersomeness" to identify the most severe casesQ81068842
Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave due to low-back pain in dutch health care professionalsQ81412491
Do changes within a manual therapy treatment session predict between-session changes for patients with cervical spine pain?Q81479059
P433issue4
P304page(s)248-254
P577publication date2008-01-01
P1433published inJournal of Manual & Manipulative TherapyQ6295483
P1476titleThe comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?
P478volume16

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q49957352Application of the McKenzie system of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) in patients with shoulder pain; a prospective longitudinal study.
Q97527119Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews
Q34430339Inter-examiner reliability of diplomats in the mechanical diagnosis and therapy system in assessing patients with shoulder pain
Q37174754Inter-rater reliability of a modified version of Delitto et al.'s classification-based system for low back pain: a pilot study
Q83784472Low back pain
Q35089625Pain characteristic differences between subacute and chronic back pain.
Q35368179Predicting a clinically important outcome in patients with low back pain following McKenzie therapy or spinal manipulation: a stratified analysis in a randomized controlled trial
Q35039984Prevalence of classification methods for patients with lumbar impairments using the McKenzie syndromes, pain pattern, manipulation, and stabilization clinical prediction rules
Q37293314Rapid resolution of chronic shoulder pain classified as derangement using the McKenzie method: a case series
Q41944434Sub-group Classification of Low Back Related Leg Pain: Is this the Catalyst Needed for Other Challenging Conditions?
Q26775928The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression