| P2093 | author name string | Robert L Sainburg | |
| P2860 | cites work | The up and down bobbing of human walking: a compromise between muscle work and efficiency | Q28756723 |
| | Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories | Q30464715 |
| | Learning from the spinal cord | Q34249950 |
| | A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control | Q35581085 |
| | Implications of low mechanical impedance in upper limb reaching motion | Q35681612 |
| | Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke | Q35976207 |
| | Internal models of limb dynamics and the encoding of limb state | Q36246267 |
| | The separate neural control of hand movements and contact forces | Q36290808 |
| | The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation | Q36546344 |
| | Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns | Q36595509 |
| | Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms | Q36732812 |
| | Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? | Q36893123 |
| | Dynamic dominance varies with handedness: reduced interlimb asymmetries in left-handers. | Q37005498 |
| | Interlimb differences in control of movement extent | Q37160623 |
| | Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control | Q37160750 |
| | Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy | Q37363472 |
| | The implications of force feedback for the lambda model | Q37396298 |
| | Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination | Q38567435 |
| | Independent control of joint stiffness in the framework of the equilibrium-point hypothesis | Q41110043 |
| | The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements | Q41466965 |
| | Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment | Q48115471 |
| | Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability | Q48223752 |
| | Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy | Q48223897 |
| | The construction of movement by the spinal cord | Q48242419 |
| | Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms | Q48258123 |
| | Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics? | Q48623846 |
| | Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement | Q48772547 |
| | Basic elements of arm postural control analyzed by unloading | Q48910706 |
| | Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. | Q52028848 |
| | Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. | Q52118031 |
| | The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. | Q52193843 |
| | Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. | Q52210440 |
| | End points of planar reaching movements are disrupted by small force pulses: an evaluation of the hypothesis of equifinality. | Q52541472 |
| | Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. | Q52891693 |
| | Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. | Q53660205 |
| | Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. | Q53674872 |
| | Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm | Q71959022 |
| | On functional tuning of nervous system during controlled or preservation of stationary pose. 3. Mechanographic analysis of human performance of simple movement tasks | Q72156466 |
| | Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception | Q72261586 |
| | On the functional structure of the nervous system during movement control or preservation of a stationary posture. I. Mechanographic analysis of the action of a joint during the performance of a postural task | Q72669231 |
| | On the functional tuning of the nervous system in movement control or preservation of stationary pose. II. Adjustable parameters in muscles | Q72970947 |
| | A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories | Q73259819 |
| | The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement | Q73322200 |
| | Experimentally confirmed mathematical model for human control of a non-rigid object | Q79260318 |
| | Changes in the referent body location and configuration may underlie human gait, as confirmed by findings of multi-muscle activity minimizations and phase resetting | Q83567867 |
| | Evaluation of trajectory planning models for arm-reaching movements based on energy cost | Q84112383 |
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 142-148 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2014-11-10 | |
| P1433 | published in | Motor Control | Q15761938 |
| P1476 | title | Should the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis (EPH) be Considered a Scientific Theory? | |
| P478 | volume | 19 | |