Clinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession (comparative, split mouth, six months study).

scientific article

Clinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession (comparative, split mouth, six months study). is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.4317/JCED.51302
P932PMC publication ID4134848
P698PubMed publication ID25136420
P5875ResearchGate publication ID264903344

P2093author name stringRahul Trivedi
Kirti Dulani
Neeta-V Bhavsar
Sakshee-R Trivedi
P2860cites workConnective tissue grafts combined with either double pedicle grafts or coronally positioned pedicle grafts: results of 266 consecutively treated defects in 200 patientsQ78565718
Guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage utilizing collagen membranes: technique and case reportsQ78849219
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root CoverageQ28315430
Treatment of localised gingival recession with subpedicle connective tissue graft and free gingival auto graft--a comparative clinical evaluationQ33814213
Collagen membranes: a reviewQ33941521
Guided tissue regeneration using a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human buccal recession. A re-entry studyQ40878665
Does placement of a connective tissue graft improve the outcomes of coronally advanced flap for coverage of single gingival recessions in upper anterior teeth? A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical trialQ47204788
Comparative Clinical Study of Connective Tissue Graft and Two Types of Bioabsorbable Barriers in the Treatment of Localized Gingival RecessionsQ51819400
Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.Q52046394
The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces.Q54412364
Development and clinical evaluation of a root coverage procedure using a collagen barrier membraneQ57221815
Gingival Recession Treatment: Guided Tissue Regeneration With Bioabsorbable Membrane Versus Connective Tissue GraftQ59193541
Long-term stability of the mucogingival complex following guided tissue regeneration in gingival recession defectsQ59193567
Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of human facial recession. A 12-case reportQ68196791
Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedureQ70771151
Comparative study of a bioresorbable and a non-resorbable membrane in the treatment of human buccal gingival recessionsQ71175994
Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 proceduresQ72413759
Dynamics of mucosal dimensions after root coverage with a bioresorbable membraneQ73449114
Histology of a human biopsy section following the placement of a subepithelial connective tissue graftQ73501423
Histological evaluation of healing and revascularization of the subepithelial connective tissue graftQ73838271
Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graftQ74570887
Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recessionQ74671309
Gingival dimensions after root coverage with free connective tissue graftsQ74744766
Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recessionQ77141196
Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessionsQ77397598
Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defectsQ77665104
A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. results of a series ofQ77931148
P433issue3
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectgingival recessionQ964920
connective tissueQ25615
P304page(s)e218-24
P577publication date2014-07-01
P1433published inJournal of clinical and experimental dentistryQ27724976
P1476titleClinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession (comparative, split mouth, six months study).
P478volume6

Reverse relations

Q38440122Comparative clinical evaluation of laterally positioned pedicle graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of Miller's Class I and II gingival recession: A 6 months studycites workP2860

Search more.