scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2004.02.010 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 15245948 |
P2093 | author name string | Sam B Bhayani | |
Christian P Pavlovich | |||
Richard E Link | |||
Li-Ming Su | |||
Wendy Sullivan | |||
P2860 | cites work | Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience | Q34744257 |
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures | Q34793100 | ||
Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy | Q46512534 | ||
Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer | Q46656860 | ||
Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points | Q48013477 | ||
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. | Q52168656 | ||
Patient-Reported Impotence and Incontinence After Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy | Q57282441 | ||
National Patterns of Prostate Cancer Treatment by Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Survey by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer | Q71651714 | ||
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute | Q73106982 | ||
Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction | Q73359029 | ||
Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy | Q73401208 | ||
Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome | Q73739704 | ||
Prospective patient-reported continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy | Q74613430 | ||
Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies | Q78014883 | ||
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 123-127 | |
P577 | publication date | 2004-07-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Urology | Q7900884 |
P1476 | title | Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique. | |
P478 | volume | 64 |
Q79162097 | Anatomic nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparison of retrograde and antegrade techniques |
Q33349235 | Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted |
Q51163573 | Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study. |
Q36505136 | Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost |
Q37573390 | Erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy: prevention and treatment |
Q38372661 | Evaluation of a robot-assisted video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery programme |
Q36920171 | Evolution of robotic surgery in the treatment of localized prostate cancer |
Q88332049 | High prostatic fascia release or standard nerve sparing? A viewpoint from the Royal Melbourne Hospital |
Q38284943 | Initial experience with the EndoAssist camera-holding robot in laparoscopic urological surgery |
Q36532084 | Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy |
Q60515631 | Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
Q42601951 | Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a community hospital without robotic assistance |
Q33978360 | Management of complications of prostate cancer treatment |
Q50248399 | Minimally invasive surgical approaches and management of prostate cancer |
Q51778651 | Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy: technique and initial outcomes. |
Q81550960 | Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique |
Q36758391 | Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? |
Q52045519 | Preliminary experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through duplication of the open technique. |
Q40611356 | Pursuit of sexual function post-radical prostatectomy |
Q33290974 | Radical prostatectomy: open, laparoscopic and robotic. Looking for a new gold standard? |
Q51964933 | Robotic prostatectomy outcomes. |
Q38630358 | Robotic radical prostatectomy: The new gold standard |
Q24605129 | Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve |
Q36950489 | Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state |
Q81160866 | Thermal energy-free laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: one-year potency outcomes |
Q30455271 | Ultrasound elastography as a tool for imaging guidance during prostatectomy: initial experience. |
Q42664772 | Use of a validated quality of life questionnaire to assess sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
Q48405409 | Veil nerve-sparing technique and postoperative urinary continence in open antegrade radical prostatectomy |
Q79400230 | Vesicourethral anastomosis during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between the single-knot running and interrupted technique |
Q80089519 | [Laparoscopic pelvic surgery: Where do we stand in the year 2006?] |
Search more.