The impact of using informative priors in a Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis: an application of endovascular versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients

scientific article published on 9 October 2012

The impact of using informative priors in a Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis: an application of endovascular versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1177/0272989X12458457
P698PubMed publication ID23054366

P50authorLehana ThabaneQ28320748
P2093author name stringJean-Eric Tarride
Ron Goeree
Eleanor M Pullenayegum
C Elizabeth McCarron
P2860cites workParametric modelling of cost data: some simulation evidenceQ30981841
Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient researchQ33437253
Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of patient level data: a review of the use of Bayesian methods to inform health technology assessmentsQ33511681
Bayesian methods for design and analysis of cost-effectiveness trials in the evaluation of health care technologiesQ35040675
Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysisQ36381197
Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSRQ37019878
Bias modelling in evidence synthesisQ37154328
Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making?Q40349299
Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screeningQ40734392
A comparison of renal function between open and endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with baseline chronic renal insufficiencyQ42596403
Perioperative complications and early outcome after endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysmsQ42620598
Mid-term results of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients anatomically suitable for endovascular repairQ42629078
Cost-effectiveness analysis of elective endovascular repair compared with open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms for patients at a high surgical risk: A 1-year patient-level analysis conducted in Ontario, CanadaQ42662612
Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repairQ42670413
Zenith AAA endovascular graft: intermediate-term results of the US multicenter trialQ44932842
AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial.Q45946472
Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curvesQ47573256
Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in VA hospitalsQ50113846
Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared.Q51839068
Quality of life before and after endovascular and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Q51941816
Matched-pair analysis of conventional versus endoluminal AAA treatment outcomes during the initial phase of an aortic endografting program.Q52168227
P433issue3
P304page(s)437-450
P577publication date2012-10-09
P1433published inMedical Decision MakingQ6806321
P1476titleThe impact of using informative priors in a Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis: an application of endovascular versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients
P478volume33

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q33830562A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer
Q58775093Cost-effectiveness of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: An analysis from the EXAMINATION randomized controlled trial
Q38990430The Role of Learning in Health Technology Assessments: An Empirical Assessment of Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs in German Hospitals

Search more.