Additive partitioning of a beta diversity index is controversial

scientific article published on 18 December 2015

Additive partitioning of a beta diversity index is controversial is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P819ADS bibcode2015PNAS..112E7161C
P356DOI10.1073/PNAS.1521798113
P932PMC publication ID4703002
P698PubMed publication ID26684769
P5875ResearchGate publication ID287420028

P50authorDénes SchmeraQ43103371
P2093author name stringYouhua Chen
P2860cites workGlobal biogeography of human infectious diseasesQ30998912
Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversityQ57205111
Measuring fractions of beta diversity and their relationships to nestedness: a theoretical and empirical comparison of novel approachesQ57232022
P433issue52
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectdiversity indexQ1230601
beta diversityQ36039
P304page(s)E7161
P577publication date2015-12-18
P1433published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaQ1146531
P1476titleAdditive partitioning of a beta diversity index is controversial
P478volume112

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q58656622A meta-analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems
Q36277701Interpreting beta-diversity components over time to conserve metacommunities in highly dynamic ecosystems
Q43103373Reply to Chen and Schmera: Partitioning beta diversity into replacement and nestedness-resultant components is not controversial

Search more.