Research ethics review: do it once and do it well

scientific article published in March 2009

Research ethics review: do it once and do it well is …
instance of (P31):
editorialQ871232
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1503/CMAJ.090172
P932PMC publication ID2653580
P698PubMed publication ID19289798
P5875ResearchGate publication ID24204180

P2093author name stringRaphael Saginur
Paul Hébert
P2860cites workThe effects of local review on informed consent documents from a multicenter clinical trials consortium.Q35131798
P433issue6
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectethical analysisQ98139384
research ethicsQ1132684
P304page(s)597-598
P577publication date2009-03-01
P1433published inCanadian Medical Association JournalQ5030320
P1476titleResearch ethics review: do it once and do it well
P478volume180

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37889474A canadian perspective on ethics review and neuroimaging: tensions and solutions.
Q38367993Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine
Q35856764Canada's new ethical guidelines for research with humans: a critique and comparison with the United States
Q33645906Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective
Q64960821How to get ethics committee approval for clinical trials in Turkey?
Q38961482Impact of regulatory assessment on clinical studies in Brazil
Q37723084Meeting the privacy requirements for the development of a multi-centre patient registry in Canada: the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry
Q37710543Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research

Search more.