editorial | Q871232 |
scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | Raphael Saginur | |
Paul Hébert | |||
P2860 | cites work | The effects of local review on informed consent documents from a multicenter clinical trials consortium. | Q35131798 |
P433 | issue | 6 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | ethical analysis | Q98139384 |
research ethics | Q1132684 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 597-598 | |
P577 | publication date | 2009-03-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Canadian Medical Association Journal | Q5030320 |
P1476 | title | Research ethics review: do it once and do it well | |
P478 | volume | 180 |
Q37889474 | A canadian perspective on ethics review and neuroimaging: tensions and solutions. |
Q38367993 | Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine |
Q35856764 | Canada's new ethical guidelines for research with humans: a critique and comparison with the United States |
Q33645906 | Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective |
Q64960821 | How to get ethics committee approval for clinical trials in Turkey? |
Q38961482 | Impact of regulatory assessment on clinical studies in Brazil |
Q37723084 | Meeting the privacy requirements for the development of a multi-centre patient registry in Canada: the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry |
Q37710543 | Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research |
Search more.