The Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical Setting.

scientific article published on 27 May 2017

The Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical Setting. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S10620-017-4599-6
P698PubMed publication ID28551709

P50authorNicholas TalleyQ7026286
Gerald J. HoltmannQ37834742
Michael JonesQ56554502
Natasha KoloskiQ88169411
P2093author name stringA Shah
J Hammer
N Martin
D Burger
H Hoelz
M Kutyla
M von Wulffen
S R Gurusamy
P2860cites workThe hospital anxiety and depression scaleQ27860968
Impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on survival in the communityQ33919405
Who is targeted for lifestyle advice? A cross-sectional survey in two general practicesQ34217477
Clinical assessment of irritable bowel syndromeQ34787577
Systematic review: health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires in gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseQ37118125
Shape shifting pain: chronification of back pain shifts brain representation from nociceptive to emotional circuits.Q37124512
Systematic Review of the Clinical Disease Severity Indices for Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseQ38475858
The brain--gut pathway in functional gastrointestinal disorders is bidirectional: a 12-year prospective population-based studyQ39665748
Measuring symptoms in the irritable bowel syndrome: development of a framework for clinical trialsQ39826545
Irritable bowel syndrome in office-based practice in the United StatesQ41878297
Evaluation of model fit in nonlinear multilevel structural equation modelingQ41994843
Development and validation of a new disease severity index: the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Index (IBDEX)Q42293565
Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care managementQ44581445
Complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease: altered symptom response to a nutrient challenge linked to gastric motor dysfunctionQ45829023
Patient-provider sex and race/ethnicity concordance: a national study of healthcare and outcomesQ46054139
International validation of a health-related quality of life questionnaire in patients with erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseQ46138749
Intensity of Chronic Pain--The Wrong Metric?Q47900656
Patient reported outcome measures in practiceQ48049891
Anxiety and depression as markers of multiplicity of sites of functional gastrointestinal disorders: a gender issue?Q48553563
Development of a new dyspepsia impact scale: the Nepean Dyspepsia IndexQ48768618
Non-medical influences on medical decision-making.Q51025833
Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability.Q51993728
Physician treatment of men and women patients: sex bias or appropriate care?Q52875740
Gender bias in the diagnosis of COPD.Q52932156
Validation of the gastrointestinal symptom score for the assessment of symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia.Q52981020
Overlap of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome in the general populationQ57840344
The irritable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progressQ60707901
Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practiceQ61890795
Assessment of functional gastrointestinal disease: the bowel disease questionnaireQ68591715
Psychometric properties of the SUNYA revision of the Psychosomatic Symptom ChecklistQ71434915
The relation between pain beliefs, negative thoughts, and psychosocial functioning in chronic pain patientsQ73427541
The 'difficult patient' as perceived by family physiciansQ74626883
Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional abdominal disorders: a population-based studyQ77118894
Guidelines--Rome III Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal DisordersQ79490044
Measurement of abdominal symptoms by validated questionnaire: a 3-month recall timeframe as recommended by Rome III is not superior to a 1-year recall timeframeQ83178704
P2507corrigendum / erratumErratum to: The Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical SettingQ48156514
P433issue8
P304page(s)1913-1922
P577publication date2017-05-27
P1433published inDigestive Diseases and SciencesQ15716711
P1476titleThe Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical Setting
P478volume62

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92251101Circulating Anti-cytolethal Distending Toxin B and Anti-vinculin Antibodies as Biomarkers in Community and Healthcare Populations With Functional Dyspepsia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Q97646519Effects of taurocholic acid metabolism by gut bacteria: A controlled feeding trial in adult African American subjects at elevated risk for colorectal cancer
Q47141166Improving Quality of Care in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
Q58110565Overlap of Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia in the Clinical Setting: Prevalence and Risk Factors
Q44278685Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: The PROMise of a Better Future?

Q48156514Erratum to: The Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical Settingmain subjectP921

Search more.