The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT.

scientific article published in September 2004

The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.YPMED.2004.05.015
P698PubMed publication ID15313087
P5875ResearchGate publication ID27827390

P50authorChris Del MarQ42305774
Joanne F AitkenQ63682319
Monika JandaQ40027202
Alexandra M. ClavarinoQ40786408
P2093author name stringShilu Tong
Barbara A Leggett
Warren R Stanton
Beth Newman
Karen L Hughes
P2860cites workParticipation in colorectal cancer screening: a reviewQ40879795
Views of a general population on mass screening for colorectal cancer: the Burgundy StudyQ44820879
Colorectal cancer screening in average-risk, asymptomatic AustraliansQ44893830
The first 15 years of the American Academy of Dermatology skin cancer screening programs: 1985-1999.Q48615792
Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making processQ48668140
Risk and reluctance: understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screeningQ50125349
Colorectal cancer screening: do they practice what they preach?Q50733971
Home bowel cancer tests and informed choice--is current information sufficient?Q51790760
Haemoccult compliance rates and reasons for non-compliance.Q52697278
Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.Q53660310
Faecal occult blood test: current practice in a rural Queensland community.Q53671348
Knowledge, Attitude and Intentions Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Faecal Occult Blood Tests in a Rural Australian PopulationQ57295692
The Quality of Qualitative Data: Two Strategies for Analyzing Medical InterviewsQ61646798
Colorectal cancer screening: optimal compliance with postal faecal occult blood testQ68038362
Participation in mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testQ69736579
Telling people about screening programmes and screening test results: how can we do it better?Q73318171
Screening for colorectal cancer: reasons for refusal of faecal occult blood testing in a general practice in EnglandQ33702845
Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost-effective approach?Q34215476
Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic reviewQ34255346
Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic populationsQ34407857
Barriers to screening for colorectal cancerQ34578232
Current international developments in population screening for colorectal cancerQ34747037
Does publicity about cancer screening raise fear of cancer? Randomised trial of the psychological effect of information about cancer screeningQ35579072
Involvement of general practitioners in mass screening. Experience of a colorectal cancer mass screening programme in the Calvados region (France).Q39414615
Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria.Q39472785
Effect of dietary restriction on participation in faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer.Q39581454
Determinants of persistent compliance with screening for colorectal cancerQ40371667
Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screeningQ40540014
Has the investment in public cancer education delivered observable changes in knowledge over the past 10 years?Q40584081
Behavioral research contributions and needs in cancer prevention and control: adherence to cancer screening adviceQ40879739
P433issue3
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcolorectal cancerQ188874
P304page(s)482-490
P577publication date2004-09-01
P1433published inPreventive MedicineQ7242397
P1476titleThe view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT.
P478volume39

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q37333526Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer
Q47957434Australian health promotion practitioners' perceptions on evaluation of empowerment and participation.
Q34523973Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.
Q33262672Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams
Q30653993Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study
Q36309560General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study
Q38455795Guaiac versus immunochemical tests: faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer in a rural community.
Q36622707Psychological Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A French Qualitative Study
Q37681713Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
Q40389186Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
Q36095716The effectiveness of FOBT vs. FIT: A meta-analysis on colorectal cancer screening test
Q39733231The many faeces of colorectal cancer screening embarrassment: preliminary psychometric development and links to screening outcome
Q33435192Use of focus group data to develop recommendations for demographically segmented colorectal cancer educational strategies

Search more.