| Q34878235 | A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement. |
| Q64087580 | Antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer maintained for 7 years in situ for two-stage primary total knee arthroplasty: a case report |
| Q82087513 | Application of an articulating spacer in two-stage revision for severe infection after total knee arthroplasty |
| Q37468845 | Are cementless stems more durable than cemented stems in two-stage revisions of infected total knee arthroplasties? |
| Q35610531 | Comparison of articulating and static spacers regarding infection with resistant organisms in total knee arthroplasty. |
| Q34622128 | Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty |
| Q33660278 | Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach |
| Q34622089 | Treatment based on the type of infected TKA improves infection control |
| Q33956372 | Two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty: does resistance of the infecting organism influence the outcome? |
| Q37978170 | Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers |
| Q83522906 | [Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. 2-5-year results following two-stage reimplantation] |